EFTA00019424.pdf
53.8 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Email chain
File Size:
53.8 KB
Summary
This document is an internal email chain among USANYS staff (including Nicholas Biase) from December 2020 discussing the filing of a response to Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed bail motion. The emails note that Judge Nathan required the response to be filed under seal to allow defense counsel time to object to redactions, explaining why the document was not immediately visible on PACER. The most recent email asks about scheduling updates for the Victim Witness website.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Nicholas Biase | USANYS Official |
Sender of an email in the chain requesting a copy of the response.
|
| Judge Nathan | Judge |
Presiding judge mentioned regarding the ruling on Maxwell's bail motion and sealing requirements.
|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant |
The subject of the 'renewed bail motion' discussed in the emails.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| USANYS |
United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York (listed in email headers).
|
|
| Department of Justice |
Implied via justice.gov URL.
|
|
| PACER |
Public Access to Court Electronic Records system mentioned regarding finding the filing.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2020-12-16
USANYS filed response to Maxwell's renewed bail motion under seal.
Court (SDNY)
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Jurisdiction implied by USANYS and URL.
|
Relationships (1)
Email signature/header lists '(USANYS)' next to his name.
Key Quotes (3)
"Has Judge Nathan scheduled a day to rule on Maxwell's renewed bail motion?"Source
EFTA00019424.pdf
Quote #1
"We filed our response today, but Judge Nathan required us to file it under seal with proposed redactions in the first instance."Source
EFTA00019424.pdf
Quote #2
"Defense counsel has 24 hours to object to our redactions."Source
EFTA00019424.pdf
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,491 characters)
From: [REDACTED]
To: "[REDACTED])" <[REDACTED]>
Cc: "[REDACTED])" <[REDACTED]>, "[REDACTED] (USANYS)"
<[REDACTED]>, [REDACTED] (USANYS) [Contractor]"
<[REDACTED]>
Subject: RE: GM response
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2020 15:03:44 +0000
To: "[REDACTED])" <[REDACTED]>
Cc: "[REDACTED])" <[REDACTED]>, "[REDACTED] (USANYS)"
<[REDACTED]>, [REDACTED] (USANYS) [Contractor]"
<[REDACTED]>
Subject: RE: GM response
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2020 15:03:44 +0000
Has Judge Nathan scheduled a day to rule on Maxwell's renewed bail motion? If/when, should we update the
VW site?
VW site?
https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/united-states-v-ghislaine-maxwell
-----Original Message-----
From: [REDACTED]) <[REDACTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2020 9:14 PM
To: [REDACTED] >
Cc: [REDACTED]); <[REDACTED]>; [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>;
[REDACTED] >
Subject: Re: GM response
From: [REDACTED]) <[REDACTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2020 9:14 PM
To: [REDACTED] >
Cc: [REDACTED]); <[REDACTED]>; [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>;
[REDACTED] >
Subject: Re: GM response
Sure thing, I'll forward it to you.
> On Dec 16, 2020, at 9:11 PM, Biase, Nicholas (USANYS) <[REDACTED]> wrote:
>
> Awesome, thanks, [REDACTED] Would it be possible to get a copy just for me and [REDACTED] Obviously no rush,
tomorrow would be fine.
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
>> On Dec 16, 2020, at 9:08 PM, [REDACTED]) <[REDACTED]> wrote:
>>
>> We filed our response today, but Judge Nathan required us to file it under seal with proposed redactions in the
first instance. Defense counsel has 24 hours to object to our redactions. So our response likely won't be on the
docket for at least a couple days.
>>
>>>> On Dec 16, 2020, at 8:46 PM, [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Pardon the interruption, I couldn't seem to find it on PACER, but when is our response to their renewed bail
package due? Thanks.
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPad
>
> Awesome, thanks, [REDACTED] Would it be possible to get a copy just for me and [REDACTED] Obviously no rush,
tomorrow would be fine.
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
>> On Dec 16, 2020, at 9:08 PM, [REDACTED]) <[REDACTED]> wrote:
>>
>> We filed our response today, but Judge Nathan required us to file it under seal with proposed redactions in the
first instance. Defense counsel has 24 hours to object to our redactions. So our response likely won't be on the
docket for at least a couple days.
>>
>>>> On Dec 16, 2020, at 8:46 PM, [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Pardon the interruption, I couldn't seem to find it on PACER, but when is our response to their renewed bail
package due? Thanks.
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPad
EFTA00019424
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document