This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Rodgers. Rodgers describes a large apartment in Manhattan, located at 59th Street near Columbus Circle, and testifies that Ms. Maxwell moved from there to a studio apartment in late 1991 or early 1992. The testimony is interrupted by an objection from an attorney, Mr. Everdell, regarding the relevance of the questioning, which is then debated in court.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Rodgers | Witness |
Testifying under direct examination about a residence.
|
| Ms. Maxwell |
Subject of the testimony, specifically regarding her residences and a move she made.
|
|
| MR. EVERDELL | Attorney |
Makes an objection on the grounds of relevance during the questioning of Rodgers.
|
| THE COURT | Judge/Presiding Officer |
Presiding over the legal proceeding, responding to objections.
|
| MS. COMEY | Attorney |
Responds to Mr. Everdell's objection, stating the questioning goes to motive.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the page as the court reporting service.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location of the large residence being described.
|
|
|
The specific location of the large residence in Manhattan.
|
"It was a very large residence. ... very large apartment."Source
"59th Street near Columbus Circle."Source
"I would say that was at the end of 1991, possibly early 1992."Source
"Objection. Relevance."Source
"Goes to motive, your Honor."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,275 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document