An email chain from May 2016 between Gwendolyn Beck and Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias/account Jeffrey E. / jeevacation@gmail.com). Beck updates Epstein on her political shifts (Trump to Kasich and back), her new elder care business charging up to $1500/day, and her upcoming trip to NYC for a Circumnavigator’s Club meeting. She explicitly complains about an associate named 'Joe' (comparing him to Bernie Madoff) for preventing her from caring for 'Fred' (presumably a mutual acquaintance with dementia).
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Jeffrey E. | Recipient/Sender |
Uses email jeevacation@gmail.com; responds 'impossisble to get rid of' regarding an unspecified topic (possibly Trump...
|
| Gwendolyn Beck | Sender/Recipient |
Author of main email; discusses political work, elder care business, and rates. Expresses affection ('Love you!') to ...
|
| Donald Trump | Political Figure |
Beck mentions moving from his campaign to Kasich's, then trying to return as an advisor. Mention of legal issues with...
|
| Kasich | Political Figure |
Referring to John Kasich; Beck joined his Advisory Committee for Elder Issues.
|
| Fred | Subject of Care |
Individual suffering from dementia; Beck wishes to help him but claims she is blocked by Joe.
|
| Joe | Gatekeeper/Associate |
Controls access to 'Fred'. Beck accuses him of lying ('intentional con') and compares him to Bernie Madoff. Had Beck ...
|
| Bernie Madoff | Reference |
Beck compares 'Joe' to Madoff regarding untruthfulness.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
"impossisble to get rid of"Source
"He’s going to have big problems with Trump University and the charge of Senior Financial Abuse in CA and FL."Source
"Know you like Joe, but it was sad sad sad that he didn’t let me do my job. Was it an intentional con? Very few things he said were the truth (but, hey, people liked Bernie Madoff too)...."Source
"I’m charging in the range of $1000 – 1500 per day plus expenses and it’s all highly confidential."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (2,322 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document