DOJ-OGR-00000614.jpg
600 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
4
Organizations
1
Locations
8
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
600 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from a legal proceeding filed on August 6, 2019. In it, a representative for the government, Ms. Moe, proposes a detailed schedule to the court for the defense to file discovery-related and pretrial motions, with corresponding deadlines for the government's responses. Ms. Moe concludes by requesting that the court schedule a trial for June of the following year.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| MS. MOE | Legal Counsel (presumably for the government) |
Speaker in the transcript proposing a schedule for motions and trial date to the court.
|
| your Honor | Judge |
Addressed by Ms. Moe, presiding over the court proceedings.
|
| kjc | Court Reporter (initials) |
Appears in the header of the document, likely the initials of the court reporter.
|
Organizations (4)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| the government | government agency |
A party in the legal case, for whom Ms. Moe is proposing a schedule for responses and trial.
|
| the defense | legal team |
The opposing party to the government in the legal case, required to file motions by certain dates.
|
| THE COURT | government agency |
The judicial body presiding over the case, addressed by Ms. Moe and making decisions on scheduling.
|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the page, likely the firm that transcribed the proceedings.
|
Timeline (8 events)
Proposal for the defense to file discovery-related motions, including those related to the nonprosecution agreement (NPA).
THE COURT
next year-02-10
Proposed deadline for the government to respond to pretrial motions.
next year-02-24
Proposed deadline for any replies to the government's response on pretrial motions.
next year-06
next year-09-13
Proposed deadline for the defense to file discovery-related motions.
next year-10-04
Proposed deadline for the government to respond to discovery-related motions.
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied by the name of the reporting company, "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
|
Relationships (2)
Ms. Moe is an officer of the court (likely a prosecutor) addressing the presiding judge ('your Honor') to propose a legal schedule.
The document outlines a schedule of motions and responses between two opposing parties in a legal case, referred to as 'the government' and 'the defense'.
Key Quotes (4)
"By when?"Source
— THE COURT
(Asking for clarification on the proposed deadline for filing motions.)
DOJ-OGR-00000614.jpg
Quote #1
"September 13, your Honor."Source
— MS. MOE
(Responding to the court's question about the deadline for discovery-related motions.)
DOJ-OGR-00000614.jpg
Quote #2
"Got it."Source
— THE COURT
(Acknowledging the proposed schedule for pretrial motions.)
DOJ-OGR-00000614.jpg
Quote #3
"The government is asking the court to set a trial date in this matter."Source
— MS. MOE
(Formally requesting the scheduling of a trial.)
DOJ-OGR-00000614.jpg
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,740 characters)
Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 42 Filed 08/06/19 Page 3 of 10
j7v2espC kjc
j7v2espC kjc
1 For discovery-related motions, we would propose that
2 the defense file any motions that they are aware of relating to
3 discovery, to include motions relating to the nonprosecution
4 agreement, by September 13 --
5 THE COURT: By when?
6 MS. MOE: September 13, your Honor.
7 -- that the government be permitted to respond by
8 October 4; with any reply due on October 11, as necessary.
9 Of course we understand that if the defense comes to
10 have additional motions related to discovery based on the
11 ongoing discovery process that we will confer and propose an
12 additional briefing schedule beyond that, as necessary. But
13 with respect to motions that the defense is already aware of,
14 including the NPA, that is the schedule that we would propose
15 at this time.
16 Regarding pretrial motions, your Honor, we would
17 propose that the defense file their motions by January 10, that
18 the government be permitted to respond by February 10, and that
19 any replies be due on or before February 24.
20 THE COURT: Got it.
21 MS. MOE: And finally, your Honor, we are prepared to
22 discuss a trial date in this case. The government is asking
23 the court to set a trial date in this matter. We would propose
24 that the court schedule this matter for trial in June of next
25 year, and we estimate that the trial would take approximately
2 the defense file any motions that they are aware of relating to
3 discovery, to include motions relating to the nonprosecution
4 agreement, by September 13 --
5 THE COURT: By when?
6 MS. MOE: September 13, your Honor.
7 -- that the government be permitted to respond by
8 October 4; with any reply due on October 11, as necessary.
9 Of course we understand that if the defense comes to
10 have additional motions related to discovery based on the
11 ongoing discovery process that we will confer and propose an
12 additional briefing schedule beyond that, as necessary. But
13 with respect to motions that the defense is already aware of,
14 including the NPA, that is the schedule that we would propose
15 at this time.
16 Regarding pretrial motions, your Honor, we would
17 propose that the defense file their motions by January 10, that
18 the government be permitted to respond by February 10, and that
19 any replies be due on or before February 24.
20 THE COURT: Got it.
21 MS. MOE: And finally, your Honor, we are prepared to
22 discuss a trial date in this case. The government is asking
23 the court to set a trial date in this matter. We would propose
24 that the court schedule this matter for trial in June of next
25 year, and we estimate that the trial would take approximately
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00000614
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document