DOJ-OGR-00014433.jpg
636 KB
Extraction Summary
8
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
636 KB
Summary
This document is a transcript of a court summation by Ms. Moe, likely a prosecutor, in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on August 10, 2022. Ms. Moe argues that the defense's attempt to discredit a witness named Jane by presenting other women named Michelle and Ava is a deliberate and meaningless distraction. She emphasizes that Jane never identified the specific women brought to court (Michelle Healey and Eva Dubin) and points out that Epstein and Maxwell's contact book contained multiple individuals with those common first names, suggesting the defense's tactic was intentionally vague and misleading.
People (8)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Moe | Speaker (likely prosecutor/attorney) |
Delivering a summation to the jury.
|
| Michelle |
A person with this first name brought in by the defense to testify.
|
|
| Ava |
A person with this first name brought in by the defense to testify.
|
|
| Jane | Witness/Victim |
A key witness whose testimony the defense is trying to discredit. She testified about being abused.
|
| Michelle Healey |
A specific person who Jane never testified was in the room when she was abused. The defense did not show Jane a pictu...
|
|
| Eva Dubin |
A specific person who Jane never testified was in the room when she was abused. The defense did not show Jane a pictu...
|
|
| Epstein |
Mentioned as the owner, along with Maxwell, of a 'black contact book' containing names of other Michelles and Evas.
|
|
| Maxwell |
Mentioned as the owner, along with Epstein, of a 'black contact book'.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the page as the court reporting service.
|
| Government | government agency |
Mentioned in reference to 'Government Exhibit 52'.
|
Timeline (2 events)
Key Quotes (3)
"Jane never testified that Michelle Healey and Eva Dubin were in the room when she was abused. She did not say that."Source
— Ms. Moe
(Clarifying to the jury that the witness Jane did not identify the specific individuals the defense is referencing.)
DOJ-OGR-00014433.jpg
Quote #1
"Calling these women to testify was completely meaningless and it was a total sideshow. Don't be distracted by that. It was meaningless."Source
— Ms. Moe
(Instructing the jury on how to perceive the defense's strategy of calling witnesses with the same first names as people mentioned by Jane.)
DOJ-OGR-00014433.jpg
Quote #2
"They left it really vague on purpose."Source
— Ms. Moe
(Accusing the defense counsel of intentionally not asking specific questions to create ambiguity and discredit Jane.)
DOJ-OGR-00014433.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,986 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 767 Filed 08/10/22 Page 33 of 257 2866
LCKCmax3
Summation - Ms. Moe
LCKCmax3
Summation - Ms. Moe
1 MS. MOE: So in the defense case, they happened to
2 find two people with the first names, Michelle and Ava, and
3 they brought them down to court to try to discredit Jane. But
4 here's the thing, Jane never testified that Michelle Healey and
5 Eva Dubin were in the room when she was abused. She did not
6 say that.
7 Defense counsel asked her about a Michelle and an Eva.
8 They expressly did not ask Jane if she knew those people's last
9 names. They didn't show Jane pictures of Eva Dubin or Michelle
10 Healey to see if those were the people she was referencing.
11 They left it really vague on purpose. But trying to discredit
12 Jane this way makes no sense. Your common sense tells you that
13 those aren't the only Michelles and Evas in the whole wide
14 world.
15 And you can take a look at excerpts from Government
16 Exhibit 52. That's the black contact book. Remember, there
17 were pages from Epstein and Maxwell's contact book, and we're
18 going to talk more about this book later. But you're going to
19 see this book had another Eva in it and three Michelles. Of
20 course there were other Michelles and Evas out there and other
21 people with those names in Epstein's life. Calling these women
22 to testify was completely meaningless and it was a total
23 sideshow. Don't be distracted by that. It was meaningless.
24 Ladies and gentlemen, the evidence tells you that Jane
25 told you the truth at this trial because you could see and hear
2 find two people with the first names, Michelle and Ava, and
3 they brought them down to court to try to discredit Jane. But
4 here's the thing, Jane never testified that Michelle Healey and
5 Eva Dubin were in the room when she was abused. She did not
6 say that.
7 Defense counsel asked her about a Michelle and an Eva.
8 They expressly did not ask Jane if she knew those people's last
9 names. They didn't show Jane pictures of Eva Dubin or Michelle
10 Healey to see if those were the people she was referencing.
11 They left it really vague on purpose. But trying to discredit
12 Jane this way makes no sense. Your common sense tells you that
13 those aren't the only Michelles and Evas in the whole wide
14 world.
15 And you can take a look at excerpts from Government
16 Exhibit 52. That's the black contact book. Remember, there
17 were pages from Epstein and Maxwell's contact book, and we're
18 going to talk more about this book later. But you're going to
19 see this book had another Eva in it and three Michelles. Of
20 course there were other Michelles and Evas out there and other
21 people with those names in Epstein's life. Calling these women
22 to testify was completely meaningless and it was a total
23 sideshow. Don't be distracted by that. It was meaningless.
24 Ladies and gentlemen, the evidence tells you that Jane
25 told you the truth at this trial because you could see and hear
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00014433
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document