HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018472.jpg

Extraction Summary

1
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
0
Events
1
Relationships
2
Quotes

Document Information

Type: House oversight committee document / blog post printout
File Size:
Summary

This document is a page from a House Oversight Committee file (Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018472) containing a printout of online articles regarding sexual communication and BDSM practices. It discusses the use of 'S&M checklists' to negotiate consent and specific sexual acts, referencing blog posts from July 2010 by Clarisse Thorn and the 'Yes Means Yes' blog. The text focuses on theoretical discussions of consent mechanics rather than specific events or transactions.

People (1)

Name Role Context
Clarisse Thorn Author/Blogger
Mentioned as the author of the original post on safewords; name appears in the URL 'clarissethorn.com'.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
House Oversight Committee
Identified via the Bates stamp footer 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT'.
WordPress
Hosting platform for the referenced blog 'yesmeansyesblog'.

Relationships (1)

Unknown Author Professional/Reference Clarisse Thorn
The text references 'Clarisse's original post' and links to her blog.

Key Quotes (2)

"We all have a right to say no to sexual acts we don't want; even if we're topping."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018472.jpg
Quote #1
"S&M checklists are long lists of different acts that sexual partners can use to discuss different acts and measure each others' interest in those acts."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018472.jpg
Quote #2

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (2,070 characters)

that eyebolt because I don't trust it", "no, I'm not interested in doing that roleplay because
I wouldn't be comfortable with it", or "I don't do play piercing because blood is a hard
limit for me." We all have a right to say no to sexual acts we don't want; even if we're
topping.
* * *
This can be found on the Internet at:
http://yesmeansyesblog.wordpress.com/2010/07/07/the-annotated-safeword/
Clarisse's original post on safewords can be found on the Internet at:
http://clarissethorn.com/blog/2010/07/03/sex-communication-tactic-derived-from-sm-2-
safewords-and-check-ins/
* * *
* * *
* * *
COMMUNICATION:
[theory] Sex Communication Tactic Derived From S&M: Checklists
This is part of the same 2010 series as the previous article -- in fact, it came first.
* * *
Checklists
S&M checklists are long lists of different acts that sexual partners can use to discuss
different acts and measure each others' interest in those acts. Each act on the checklist
usually looks something like this:
FLOGGING -- GIVING O O O O O
FLOGGING -- RECEIVING O O O O O
Each partner rates each entry by filling out 1-5 bubbles, with 1 darkened bubble meaning
"Not interested" and 5 bubbles meaning "I crave this!"
I think this concept is brilliant because:
1) Too often, it's assumed that "sex" encompasses certain acts, and if you're interested in
a sexual relationship you must be interested in all those acts. Or there's assumed to be a
kind of linear progression, as exemplified in the "base system," where "first base" is
groping and "home base" is penis-in-vagina sex. Talking about each sexual act as its own
self-contained idea short-circuits those problematic ideas about sex and makes it easier
for couples to turn down some of the "assumed" acts (e.g., if I don't want oral sex but I do
want penis-in-vagina...).
2) It provides an easy way to communicate desires -- if a person is nervous about saying,
"Hey, is it okay if I flog you?" then the couple doesn't even have to talk about it right
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018472

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document