DOJ-OGR-00001090.jpg

647 KB

Extraction Summary

1
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
0
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 647 KB
Summary

This legal document, dated April 1, 2021, is a court's ruling regarding the defendant, Ms. Maxwell. The court concludes that Ms. Maxwell is a substantial flight risk and that the government has met its burden to show that no conditions of release would be sufficient. The court also finds her proposed bail package, secured by a foreign property worth several million dollars, to be insufficient, citing her failure to provide a full accounting of her financial situation.

People (1)

Name Role Context
Ms. Maxwell Defendant
Mentioned throughout the document as the defendant who poses a flight risk and has not provided a full accounting of ...

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. Company
Listed at the bottom of the page, likely the court reporting service that transcribed the proceedings.
the court Government agency
The judicial body making the determination about the defendant's flight risk and bail conditions.
the government Government agency
The prosecuting party that has the burden to show the defendant is a flight risk.

Timeline (1 events)

2021-04-01
The court concluded that the defendant, Ms. Maxwell, poses a substantial flight risk and that no conditions of release would be sufficient to assure her presence. Her proposed bail package was deemed insufficient due to a lack of financial transparency.

Locations (1)

Location Context
Mentioned as the security for Ms. Maxwell's proposed bail package, said to be worth several million dollars.

Relationships (2)

Ms. Maxwell Legal (adversarial) the court
The court is ruling against Ms. Maxwell, concluding she is a flight risk and finding her financial disclosures for her bail package to be insufficient.
Ms. Maxwell Legal (adversarial) the government
The government has the burden to show Ms. Maxwell is a flight risk, and the court is persuaded by the government's position.

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,581 characters)

Case 21-770, Document 20-2, 04/01/2021, 3068530, Page149 of 200
k7e2MaxC kjc
86
incentive she had before this indictment may very well have
changed after it. In other words, her federal indictment may
well change her earlier decisions and, given the defendant's
resources, the court concludes that Ms. Maxwell poses a
substantial actual risk of flight.
Having made this determination, the court next turns
to whether the government has met its burden to show by a
preponderance of the evidence that no combination of conditions
could reasonably assure the defendant's presence. The court is
persuaded that the government has met this burden and concludes
that even the most restrictive conditions of release would be
insufficient.
As an initial matter, the financial component of
Ms. Maxwell's proposed bail package appears to represent a
relatively small component of the access available to her and
is secured only by a foreign property said to be worth about
several million dollars. But even a substantially larger
package would be insufficient. The extent of her financial
resources is demonstrated by some of the transactions and bank
accounts discussed in the government's submission and here
today, and Ms. Maxwell has apparently failed to submit a full
accounting or even a close to full accounting of her financial
situation. She has provided the court with scarce information
about the financial information of her proposed cosigners, for
example. Without a clear picture of Ms. Maxwell's finances and
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00001090

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document