This document is a transcript of a legal summation by Ms. Menninger, who is attempting to undermine the credibility of a witness referred to as 'Jane'. Menninger highlights inconsistencies in the witness's statements, such as failing to identify Ghislaine and others in a sworn interrogatory, and contrasts her claims of extreme poverty with evidence that she and her brothers applied to an expensive arts camp costing $12,000 per year.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Menninger | Speaker (implied) |
Mentioned in the header as the speaker for the summation.
|
| Epstein | Subject of accusation |
Mentioned as the person an unnamed woman was asked to identify others besides, in relation to sexual misconduct.
|
| Ghislaine | Alleged participant |
Mentioned as someone the unnamed woman did not identify in her interrogatory response.
|
| Eva | Name given to government |
One of the names the unnamed woman had previously given to the government.
|
| Michelle | Name given to government |
One of the names the unnamed woman had previously given to the government.
|
| Sophie | Name given to government |
One of the names the unnamed woman had previously given to the government.
|
| Jane | Subject of testimony |
A person whose story and timeline are being discussed, likely a witness or victim.
|
| Jane's father | Father |
Mentioned as having died when Jane was 13.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the page, likely the court reporting agency that transcribed the proceedings.
|
"she was so stricken by poverty that she had no lunch money at times, and she was homeless."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,992 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document