DOJ-OGR-00020984.jpg

597 KB

Extraction Summary

3
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
4
Events
1
Relationships
0
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 597 KB
Summary

This document is an Opinion & Order from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, dated April 29, 2022, concerning the case of Ghislaine Maxwell. Authored by Judge Alison J. Nathan, it provides background on Maxwell's 2020 indictment and subsequent conviction on five counts related to sex trafficking with her 'longtime companion,' Jeffrey Epstein. The order addresses the defendant's post-trial motions to vacate the convictions.

People (3)

Name Role Context
Ghislaine Maxwell Defendant
The defendant in case 20-CR-330, indicted for participation in a sex trafficking scheme with Jeffrey Epstein. She was...
Jeffrey Epstein Companion / Co-conspirator
Mentioned as Ghislaine Maxwell's longtime companion and co-conspirator in a scheme to entice, transport, and traffic ...
ALISON J. NATHAN Circuit Judge
The judge presiding over the case, sitting by designation, who authored the Opinion & Order.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Government Agency
The court where the case United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell is being heard.
The Government Government Agency
Refers to the prosecution (United States of America) that presented evidence against Ghislaine Maxwell at trial.

Timeline (4 events)

2020
Ghislaine Maxwell was indicted for her participation in a sex trafficking scheme.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Ghislaine Maxwell United States of America
2022-04-29
Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell's post-trial motions are before the Court.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
A thirteen-day trial was held for Ghislaine Maxwell.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
The jury deliberated for over five days and returned a verdict of guilty on five of the six counts against Ghislaine Maxwell.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Locations (1)

Location Context
The jurisdiction of the United States District Court hearing the case.

Relationships (1)

Ghislaine Maxwell Personal and Criminal Jeffrey Epstein
The document describes Jeffrey Epstein as Ghislaine Maxwell's 'longtime companion' and states she was charged with 'conspiring with Jeffrey Epstein' in a sex trafficking scheme.

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,855 characters)

Case 22-1426, Document 58, 02/28/2023, 3475901, Page158 of 221
A-358
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 657 Filed 04/29/22 Page 1 of 45
USDC SDNY
DOCUMENT
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
DOC #:
DATE FILED: 4/29/22
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
United States of America,
-v-
Ghislaine Maxwell,
Defendant.
20-CR-330 (AJN)
OPINION & ORDER
ALISON J. NATHAN, Circuit Judge, sitting by designation:
In 2020, the Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell was indicted for her participation in a scheme to entice, transport, and traffic underage girls for sexual abuse by and with Jeffrey Epstein, her longtime companion. The Government at trial presented extensive witness testimony from multiple victim witnesses and others, as well as corroborating documentary and physical evidence. The testimony and other trial evidence established the Defendant’s role in grooming and recruiting underage girls and using the cover of massage to perpetrate sexual abuse.
Following the thirteen-day trial, the Court submitted to the jury the six counts in the Indictment. The jury deliberated for over five days and returned a verdict of guilty on five of the six counts. Two of these counts of conviction charged the Defendant with substantive violations of federal statutes that target sexual abuse of minors—the Mann Act as to Count Four and the Trafficking Victims Protection Act as to Count Six. The other three counts of conviction, Counts One, Three, and Five, charged the Defendant with conspiring with Jeffrey Epstein to violate those same statutes from 1994 to 2004.
Before the Court are the Defendant’s post-trial motions making four alternative arguments for vacating some or all of her five counts of conviction. First, the Defendant argues that judgment may be imposed on only one of the three conspiracy counts (i.e., Counts One,
DOJ-OGR-00020984

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document