This document is a page from a court transcript dated February 24, 2022, showing the cross-examination of a witness named Berke by an attorney, Mr. Okula. Mr. Okula questions Berke about a hypothetical situation involving a suspended attorney, Catherine Conrad, serving as Juror No. 1. Berke repeatedly refuses to answer, calling the scenario 'far-fetched' and an attempt to make him speculate on an experience he's never had.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Berke | Witness |
A witness being cross-examined by Mr. Okula.
|
| Catherine Conrad | Suspended attorney / Juror No. 1 |
Mentioned as a suspended attorney who is allegedly also Juror No. 1 in the trial.
|
| Mr. Okula | Attorney |
The attorney conducting the cross-examination of the witness, Berke.
|
| Judge | Judge |
Addressed by Mr. Okula at the conclusion of his questioning.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
The court reporting agency that transcribed the proceeding, listed at the bottom of the page.
|
"What you are ignoring is it's such a far-fetched idea that any citizen would come in here and lie to be a juror."Source
"You're asking me to speculate and give opinions about an experience I've never had."Source
"Judge, I have no further questions for Mr. Berke."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,464 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document