DOJ-OGR-00014661.jpg
516 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
4
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
516 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on August 10, 2022. It captures a dialogue between attorneys Ms. Comey, Mr. Pagliuca, and the judge regarding a document used for impeachment that is not formally in evidence. They discuss how to properly handle this situation, with the judge proposing a clarifying instruction for the jury.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| MS. COMEY | Attorney |
Speaker in the transcript, addressing the court regarding a document not in evidence.
|
| MR. PAGLIUCA | Attorney |
Speaker in the transcript, discussing impeachment from a document and related testimony.
|
| Ms. Sternheim | Unknown |
Mentioned by Mr. Pagliuca as someone who confirmed what he was about to say.
|
| Your Honor | Judge |
Addressed by Ms. Comey and Mr. Pagliuca; also speaks as 'THE COURT'.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| THE COURT | Government agency |
A participant in the dialogue, representing the judicial body presiding over the case.
|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Listed at the bottom of the page as the court reporting service.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-08-10
A discussion took place between counsel and the judge regarding the evidentiary status of a document used for impeachment and how to instruct the jury about it.
Courtroom in the Southern District
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned in the footer (SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS), indicating the location of the court proceedings.
|
Relationships (4)
They are both addressing the court, likely as opposing counsel, discussing a point of law regarding evidence in a case.
Mr. Pagliuca states that Ms. Sternheim told him what he was about to say, suggesting they are colleagues working on the same side of the case.
Ms. Comey addresses the judge ('Your Honor') as an attorney arguing a point in a formal court proceeding.
Mr. Pagliuca addresses the judge ('Your Honor') as an attorney arguing a point in a formal court proceeding.
Key Quotes (4)
"Your Honor, I believe a note saying that that document is not in evidence would be an appropriate response."Source
— MS. COMEY
(Proposing how to address a document that is not in evidence.)
DOJ-OGR-00014661.jpg
Quote #1
"I agree that the document is not in evidence. But there is 613 impeachment from that document."Source
— MR. PAGLIUCA
(Acknowledging the document is not evidence but arguing its use for impeachment is relevant.)
DOJ-OGR-00014661.jpg
Quote #2
"How about "all admitted exhibits are before you.""Source
— THE COURT
(Suggesting a neutral instruction for the jury regarding the evidence.)
DOJ-OGR-00014661.jpg
Quote #3
"The problem, your Honor, is that there's testimony about it."Source
— MR. PAGLIUCA
(Raising a concern about the judge's proposed instruction because testimony related to the document already exists.)
DOJ-OGR-00014661.jpg
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,455 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 769 Filed 08/10/22 Page 3 of 19 3094
LCLVMAXI
LCLVMAXI
1 Proposals for how to respond.
2 MS. COMEY: Your Honor, I believe a note saying that
3 that document is not in evidence would be an appropriate
4 response.
5 MR. PAGLIUCA: Your Honor, I think since there was
6 impeachment from the document -- I agree it's not a deposition,
7 and I agree that the document is not in evidence. But there is
8 613 impeachment from that document. I think the Court -- and
9 Ms. Sternheim tells me what I was about to say, which is good;
10 we're consistent.
11 I think something like, you know, You have the
12 evidence and testimony relating to 3505-005. That's it. I
13 don't think that there should be any further discussion about
14 what is or is not in evidence.
15 THE COURT: How about "all admitted exhibits are
16 before you."
17 MS. COMEY: I think that's fine, your Honor.
18 MR. PAGLIUCA: The problem, your Honor, is that
19 there's testimony about it.
20 THE COURT: You lost your mic.
21 MR. PAGLIUCA: Sorry.
22 There's testimony about it.
23 THE COURT: It's true they've not asked for that
24 though.
25 MR. PAGLIUCA: They do have the transcript where it's
2 MS. COMEY: Your Honor, I believe a note saying that
3 that document is not in evidence would be an appropriate
4 response.
5 MR. PAGLIUCA: Your Honor, I think since there was
6 impeachment from the document -- I agree it's not a deposition,
7 and I agree that the document is not in evidence. But there is
8 613 impeachment from that document. I think the Court -- and
9 Ms. Sternheim tells me what I was about to say, which is good;
10 we're consistent.
11 I think something like, you know, You have the
12 evidence and testimony relating to 3505-005. That's it. I
13 don't think that there should be any further discussion about
14 what is or is not in evidence.
15 THE COURT: How about "all admitted exhibits are
16 before you."
17 MS. COMEY: I think that's fine, your Honor.
18 MR. PAGLIUCA: The problem, your Honor, is that
19 there's testimony about it.
20 THE COURT: You lost your mic.
21 MR. PAGLIUCA: Sorry.
22 There's testimony about it.
23 THE COURT: It's true they've not asked for that
24 though.
25 MR. PAGLIUCA: They do have the transcript where it's
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00014661
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document