DOJ-OGR-00017775.jpg
546 KB
Extraction Summary
6
People
1
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
3
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
546 KB
Summary
This court transcript from August 10, 2022, documents a procedural discussion between the judge and several attorneys (Moe, Sternheim, Menninger). The conversation focuses on the next witness, identified as Matt, and addresses how potential evidentiary issues, such as the introduction of prior consistent statements, will be handled. An attorney also requests permission to ask a leading question under Rule 611(c).
People (6)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Presiding over the hearing, asking questions, and making rulings on procedural matters.
|
| MS. MOE | Attorney |
An attorney addressing the court about the next witness, Matt, and issues related to prior consistent statements.
|
| Jane | Witness |
Mentioned in the header, indicating she is the witness currently undergoing cross-examination.
|
| Matt | Witness |
Identified by Ms. Moe as the next witness to be called.
|
| Ms. Sternheim | Attorney |
An attorney whose previous statement about objections is referenced by the Court. She also speaks briefly.
|
| Ms. Menninger | Attorney |
An attorney who requests permission from the court to ask a leading question under Rule 611(c).
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Listed at the bottom of the document as the court reporting service.
|
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied by the name of the court reporting agency, "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
|
Relationships (3)
Ms. Moe addresses the Court as 'Your Honor' and discusses procedural matters of the case with the judge.
The Court references a prior statement made by Ms. Sternheim regarding legal objections, indicating their professional interaction in the proceeding.
Ms. Menninger addresses the Court as 'your Honor' and seeks a ruling on a procedural matter (asking a leading question).
Key Quotes (3)
"That the next witness we anticipate calling would be the witness identified as Matt. And so just wanted to tee up any issues relating to prior consistent statements."Source
— MS. MOE
(Informing the court about the next witness and a potential evidentiary issue.)
DOJ-OGR-00017775.jpg
Quote #1
"I think where we left it was that, as Ms. Sternheim said, we'll evaluate when you seek to introduce a prior consistent statement whether, in fact, it's consistent and whether they have attacked the veracity of that and, if not, you won't object."Source
— THE COURT
(Recalling a previous agreement or ruling on how objections to prior consistent statements will be handled.)
DOJ-OGR-00017775.jpg
Quote #2
"Under the authority of Rule 611(c), I have redrafted it into a leading question, if that's permissible, your Honor."Source
— MS. MENNINGER
(Requesting permission from the judge to ask a leading question.)
DOJ-OGR-00017775.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,367 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 745 Filed 08/10/22 Page 166 of 264
LC1VMAX5
Jane - cross
LC1VMAX5
Jane - cross
1 (Pause)
2 THE COURT: What else do we need to take up?
3 MS. MOE: Your Honor, I'm not quite sure about the
4 timing for the length of cross, but I did want to just remind
5 the Court that the next witness raises the prior consistent
6 statements issues we discussed at the conclusion of the Court
7 day yesterday.
8 THE COURT: I'm sorry, that what?
9 MS. MOE: That the next witness we anticipate calling
10 would be the witness identified as Matt. And so just wanted to
11 tee up any issues relating to prior consistent statements.
12 THE COURT: I think where we left it was that, as
13 Ms. Sternheim said, we'll evaluate when you seek to introduce a
14 prior consistent statement whether, in fact, it's consistent
15 and whether they have attacked the veracity of that and, if
16 not, you won't object.
17 MS. STERNHEIM: Right.
18 THE COURT: And if they do object, I'll decide.
19 MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor.
20 I just wanted to clear that in advance.
21 THE COURT: Thank you.
22 Okay. What do you have, Ms. Menninger?
23 MS. MENNINGER: Under the authority of Rule 611(c), I
24 have redrafted it into a leading question, if that's
25 permissible, your Honor. And what I would ask is --
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00017775
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document