DOJ-OGR-00010096.jpg
440 KB
Extraction Summary
8
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
3
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
440 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on March 22, 2022. In it, a judge questions a witness about their law firm's obligation to disclose information, referencing a July 21 letter. The questioning also covers the court's decision to replace Juror No. 11 during deliberations and whether the witness considered raising a separate issue concerning Juror No. 1, which had been previously discussed with a Ms. Brune and Ms. Trzaskoma.
People (8)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Edelstein |
Name mentioned at the top of the page, likely a party or attorney in the case.
|
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Speaker, questioning the witness.
|
| THE WITNESS | Witness |
Speaker, being questioned by the court.
|
| Juror No. 11 | Juror |
Displaced from the jury during deliberations due to a health emergency.
|
| Ms. Brune |
Participant in a discussion with the witness and Ms. Trzaskoma in a park on May 12 regarding Juror No. 1.
|
|
| Ms. Trzaskoma |
Participant in a discussion with the witness and Ms. Brune in a park on May 12 regarding Juror No. 1.
|
|
| Juror No. 1 | Juror |
Subject of a discussion on May 12 and the witness's testimony.
|
| MR. OKULA |
Speaker, addressing the court to ask follow-up questions.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the transcript as the court reporting service.
|
| the government | government agency |
A party in the legal case, mentioned as having failed to raise an issue and having objected to the replacement of a j...
|
Timeline (3 events)
A court hearing where a witness is being questioned by a judge.
Courtroom
Juror No. 11 was displaced during jury deliberations due to a health emergency and replaced with an alternate.
Court
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location of a discussion on May 12 between the witness, Ms. Brune, and Ms. Trzaskoma.
|
Relationships (2)
They discussed a case-related issue (Juror No. 1) together in a park on May 12.
They discussed a case-related issue (Juror No. 1) together in a park on May 12.
Key Quotes (3)
"My question is not whether it would have come out. If it had not come out, if the Court had not pressed your law firm and the government failed to raise the issue, would your law firm have disclosed the information set forth in the July 21 letter?"Source
— THE COURT
(The judge questioning the witness about their law firm's hypothetical actions regarding disclosure.)
DOJ-OGR-00010096.jpg
Quote #1
"In the middle of jury deliberations, this Court displaced Juror No. 11 because of a health emergency, replaced him with an alternate after much discussion with counsel and over the objection of the government, and directed the jury to restart its jury deliberations."Source
— THE COURT
(The judge recounting the events that led to the replacement of a juror.)
DOJ-OGR-00010096.jpg
Quote #2
"Did you give any consideration at that time to raising the issue that you discussed in the park on May 12 with Ms. Brune and Ms. Trzaskoma regarding Juror No. 1?"Source
— THE COURT
(The judge asking the witness if they considered raising a previously discussed issue about another juror when Juror No. 11 was replaced.)
DOJ-OGR-00010096.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,434 characters)
Case 2:20-cr-00033-B ABN Document 646-22 Filed 03/22/22 Page 128 of 330
A-5813
A-5813
C2grdau4
Edelstein
356
1 THE COURT: No. My question is not whether it would
2 have come out. If it had not come out, if the Court had not
3 pressed your law firm and the government failed to raise the
4 issue, would your law firm have disclosed the information set
5 forth in the July 21 letter?
6 THE WITNESS: I don't know.
7 THE COURT: Did you ever have any discussion with
8 anyone in the firm about that?
9 THE WITNESS: I think that our, at least my, frame of
10 mind was that we didn't know they were the same person, so I
11 just didn't think that there was a waiver issue.
12 THE COURT: In the middle of jury deliberations, this
13 Court displaced Juror No. 11 because of a health emergency,
14 replaced him with an alternate after much discussion with
15 counsel and over the objection of the government, and directed
16 the jury to restart its jury deliberations. Did you give any
17 consideration at that time to raising the issue that you
18 discussed in the park on May 12 with Ms. Brune and Ms.
19 Trzaskoma regarding Juror No. 1?
20 THE WITNESS: No. I continued to believe that Juror
21 No. 1 was who she said she was. That didn't occur to me, no.
22 THE COURT: Any further inquiries?
23 MR. OKULA: May I follow up on one or two questions,
24 your Honor?
25 THE COURT: Yes.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
Edelstein
356
1 THE COURT: No. My question is not whether it would
2 have come out. If it had not come out, if the Court had not
3 pressed your law firm and the government failed to raise the
4 issue, would your law firm have disclosed the information set
5 forth in the July 21 letter?
6 THE WITNESS: I don't know.
7 THE COURT: Did you ever have any discussion with
8 anyone in the firm about that?
9 THE WITNESS: I think that our, at least my, frame of
10 mind was that we didn't know they were the same person, so I
11 just didn't think that there was a waiver issue.
12 THE COURT: In the middle of jury deliberations, this
13 Court displaced Juror No. 11 because of a health emergency,
14 replaced him with an alternate after much discussion with
15 counsel and over the objection of the government, and directed
16 the jury to restart its jury deliberations. Did you give any
17 consideration at that time to raising the issue that you
18 discussed in the park on May 12 with Ms. Brune and Ms.
19 Trzaskoma regarding Juror No. 1?
20 THE WITNESS: No. I continued to believe that Juror
21 No. 1 was who she said she was. That didn't occur to me, no.
22 THE COURT: Any further inquiries?
23 MR. OKULA: May I follow up on one or two questions,
24 your Honor?
25 THE COURT: Yes.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00010096
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document