DOJ-OGR-00001329.jpg

627 KB

Extraction Summary

2
People
1
Organizations
2
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 627 KB
Summary

This legal document details Judge Nathan's reasons for denying Ghislaine Maxwell's previous bail requests, citing her significant wealth as a flight risk and her "extraordinary capacity to evade detection." The judge was also unpersuaded by arguments that Maxwell's confinement conditions were overly onerous. The document concludes by noting that on February 23, 2021, Maxwell filed a third bail application, proposing to renounce her French and British citizenship as a new condition.

People (2)

Name Role Context
Maxwell Defendant
Mentioned throughout as the subject of bail applications and judicial rulings.
Judge Nathan Judge
Mentioned as the judge who rejected Maxwell's bail arguments and conditions.

Organizations (1)

Name Type Context
Metropolitan Detention Center government agency
Mentioned as the facility (“MDC”) where Maxwell is confined.

Timeline (1 events)

2021-02-23
Maxwell filed a third bail application, proposing two additional bail conditions: renunciation of her French and British citizenship.

Locations (2)

Location Context
Mentioned in the context of Maxwell's French citizenship, which she proposed renouncing.
Mentioned in the context of Maxwell's British citizenship, which she proposed renouncing.

Relationships (2)

Judge Nathan professional Maxwell
Judge Nathan is the presiding judge in Maxwell's case and has repeatedly denied her bail applications based on legal arguments detailed in the document.
Maxwell professional her lawyers
The document states that Maxwell has had time to communicate with her lawyers and that Judge Nathan would ensure she could continue to meet with them to prepare her defense.

Key Quotes (4)

"the amount of wealth that she would retain were she to flee, in addition to contingent assets and future income streams that are not accounted for in the bail package, would plausibly enable her to compensate them, in part or in full, for their losses."
Source
— Judge Nathan (Reasoning for concluding that parties supporting Maxwell's bond did not alter the conclusion about her flight risk.)
DOJ-OGR-00001329.jpg
Quote #1
"extraordinary capacity to evade detection."
Source
— Judge Nathan (A concern reiterated by Judge Nathan regarding Maxwell when rejecting proposed release conditions.)
DOJ-OGR-00001329.jpg
Quote #2
"unpersuaded"
Source
— Judge Nathan (Describing Judge Nathan's reaction to Maxwell's argument about her confinement conditions.)
DOJ-OGR-00001329.jpg
Quote #3
"that the conditions of her confinement are uniquely onerous, interfere with her ability to participate in her defense, and thus justify release."
Source
— Maxwell (Maxwell's argument regarding her confinement, which Judge Nathan rejected.)
DOJ-OGR-00001329.jpg
Quote #4

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,474 characters)

Case 21-770, Document 40-1, 04/12/2021, 3075763, Page12 of 25
parties to support Maxwell’s bond did not alter this conclusion because “the amount of wealth that she would retain were she to flee, in addition to contingent assets and future income streams that are not accounted for in the bail package, would plausibly enable her to compensate them, in part or in full, for their losses.” (Id. at 18). Judge Nathan also rejected Maxwell’s proposed conditions of release to a relative’s custody and private security guards, reiterating her concern regarding Maxwell’s “extraordinary capacity to evade detection.” (Id. at 18-19).
22. Finally, Judge Nathan was “unpersuaded” by Maxwell’s argument “that the conditions of her confinement are uniquely onerous, interfere with her ability to participate in her defense, and thus justify release.” (Id. at 20). Maxwell did not “meaningfully dispute” that she has received more time than other inmates at the Metropolitan Detention Center (“MDC”) to review discovery and as much, if not more, time to communicate with her lawyers. (Id.). Judge Nathan reiterated that she would continue to ensure that Maxwell is able to speak and meet regularly with her attorneys and review discovery to prepare her defense. (Id. at 20 n.3).
D. The Third Bail Application
23. On February 23, 2021, Maxwell filed a third bail application, proposing two additional bail conditions: (1) renunciation of her French and British
12
DOJ-OGR-00001329

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document