DOJ-OGR-00015002.jpg

540 KB

Extraction Summary

3
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
5
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 540 KB
Summary

This document is a page from a court transcript dated January 15, 2025, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Rocchio. The questioning focuses on the methodology of a study or article, specifically the demographic characteristics of the "experts" and professionals involved, and challenges the response rate of the data collection, which the questioner labels a "dropout rate."

People (3)

Name Role Context
Rocchio Witness
Mentioned in the header as the person being cross-examined.
Unnamed Questioner Attorney/Examiner
Represented by "Q." in the transcript, conducting the cross-examination.
Unnamed Answerer Witness
Represented by "A." in the transcript, presumably Rocchio, answering questions.

Organizations (1)

Name Type Context
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. company
Listed at the bottom of the page as the court reporting agency.

Timeline (2 events)

2025-01-15
Cross-examination of witness Rocchio in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE.
Data was collected for an article by contacting 33 professionals via email, with 22 responding.
33 professionals

Relationships (1)

Unnamed Questioner professional Rocchio
The document is a transcript of a cross-examination, an adversarial legal process where the questioner is challenging the witness, Rocchio, on the details of an article or study.

Key Quotes (5)

"So those are the experts; right?"
Source
— Questioner (Questioning the identity and qualifications of the subjects described in an article.)
DOJ-OGR-00015002.jpg
Quote #1
"Those are some of the qualities of the experts, yes, the demographics."
Source
— Answerer (Rocchio) (Confirming that the previously mentioned details are demographic descriptions of the experts in an article.)
DOJ-OGR-00015002.jpg
Quote #2
"...there were 33 professionals contacted by email, and only 22 of these people responded; right?"
Source
— Questioner (Questioning the methodology and response rate of the data collection for the article.)
DOJ-OGR-00015002.jpg
Quote #3
"So we have a dropout rate here of roughly a third to begin with; correct?"
Source
— Questioner (Characterizing the non-response rate of the data collection as a "dropout rate".)
DOJ-OGR-00015002.jpg
Quote #4
"That wouldn't be referred to as a dropout rate in the field"
Source
— Answerer (Rocchio) (Disagreeing with the questioner's characterization of the non-response rate.)
DOJ-OGR-00015002.jpg
Quote #5

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,348 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 782 Filed 01/15/25 Page 126 of 158 126
LBAGmax4
Rocchio - Cross
1 late 50s and identified as white or Latina."
2 Do you see that?
3 A. I do.
4 Q. So those are the experts; right?
5 A. Those are some of the qualities of the experts, yes, the
6 demographics.
7 Q. And then if we go down to the participants section here,
8 the last part says, "A few professionals, those in law
9 enforcement" -- on the next page -- "also worked with
10 perpetrators of interpersonal abuse and coercion."
11 Do you see that?
12 A. I do.
13 Q. And then we go on to talk about the professionals who were
14 over the age of 40, et cetera, et cetera. So that's the
15 identification of these folks in this article; right?
16 A. Again, that's the description of their -- some of their
17 backgrounds and demographics, yes.
18 Q. And then in terms of how this data was collected,
19 initially, if we go to data collection, which is the next
20 paragraph, there were 33 professionals contacted by email, and
21 only 22 of these people responded; right?
22 A. Yes.
23 Q. So we have a dropout rate here of roughly a third to begin
24 with; correct?
25 A. That wouldn't be referred to as a dropout rate in the field
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00015002

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document