DOJ-OGR-00017940.jpg
614 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
614 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022. It captures a discussion between an attorney, Ms. Pomerantz, and the judge ('THE COURT') after the jury has been excused for a break. Ms. Pomerantz seeks to clarify the record regarding the scope of Dr. Rocchio's testimony, stating the government's understanding that his opinion on the presence of a third party was excluded, and distinguishing this from the defense's theory of 'grooming by proxy'.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Rocchio | Dr. |
Mentioned in the header as the subject of a 'Direct' examination. Ms. Pomerantz refers to 'Dr. Rocchio's opinion' and...
|
| MS. POMERANTZ | Attorney (implied) |
A speaker in the transcript, addressing the Court ('your Honor').
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
A speaker in the transcript, addressed as 'your Honor'. Directs the jury and the proceedings.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Listed at the bottom of the page, likely the court reporting service that transcribed the proceedings.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-08-10
A portion of a court trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) where, after a witness's testimony, an attorney (Ms. Pomerantz) clarifies a point of evidence with the judge regarding the scope of that testimony.
Courtroom (implied)
Relationships (2)
Ms. Pomerantz formally addresses the Court as 'your Honor' within a legal proceeding to discuss matters of evidence and testimony.
Ms. Pomerantz discusses the testimony and opinions of 'Dr. Rocchio', indicating she is likely an attorney who has examined him as a witness.
Key Quotes (2)
"Your Honor, I just wanted to note, the government understood that the Court's opinion excluded Dr. Rocchio's opinion regarding the presence of a third party."Source
— MS. POMERANTZ
(Addressing the judge to clarify the scope of admissible testimony from Dr. Rocchio.)
DOJ-OGR-00017940.jpg
Quote #1
"And on page 73, I had asked a question about whether there was anything about what you're testifying about here that says that grooming can only be done for the benefit of the person doing the grooming, to which Dr. Rocchio responded, No, there's not."Source
— MS. POMERANTZ
(Recounting a previous exchange from the trial transcript to the judge to support her point.)
DOJ-OGR-00017940.jpg
Quote #2
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,553 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 747 Filed 08/10/22 Page 67 of 228 743
LC2VMAX2 Rocchio – Direct
LC2VMAX2 Rocchio – Direct
1 confusing and also causes the most -- the most harm. We know
2 that the more they trusted the individual, then, of course, the
3 more they feel betrayed, the more betrayal there's been. And
4 to the extent that there's betrayal in the relationship, then
5 the individuals are really struggling to a much, much greater
6 degree, often trying to understand what happened, how it
7 happened and why, and what its effect is certainly.
8 MS. POMERANTZ: Nothing further, your Honor.
9 THE COURT: All right. Thank you.
10 We'll take our mid-morning break, members of the jury,
11 about a 15-minute break. Thank you so much.
12 (Jury not present)
13 THE COURT: You may be seated.
14 Matters to take up?
15 MS. POMERANTZ: Your Honor, I just wanted to note, the
16 government understood that the Court's opinion excluded Dr.
17 Rocchio's opinion regarding the presence of a third party.
18 We did check the transcript, your Honor. And on page
19 73, I had asked a question about whether there was anything
20 about what you're testifying about here that says that grooming
21 can only be done for the benefit of the person doing the
22 grooming, to which Dr. Rocchio responded, No, there's not. And
23 then your Honor had asked a series of questions relating to the
24 presence of a third party, what the defense has been referring
25 to as grooming by proxy, which is a different subject matter.
2 that the more they trusted the individual, then, of course, the
3 more they feel betrayed, the more betrayal there's been. And
4 to the extent that there's betrayal in the relationship, then
5 the individuals are really struggling to a much, much greater
6 degree, often trying to understand what happened, how it
7 happened and why, and what its effect is certainly.
8 MS. POMERANTZ: Nothing further, your Honor.
9 THE COURT: All right. Thank you.
10 We'll take our mid-morning break, members of the jury,
11 about a 15-minute break. Thank you so much.
12 (Jury not present)
13 THE COURT: You may be seated.
14 Matters to take up?
15 MS. POMERANTZ: Your Honor, I just wanted to note, the
16 government understood that the Court's opinion excluded Dr.
17 Rocchio's opinion regarding the presence of a third party.
18 We did check the transcript, your Honor. And on page
19 73, I had asked a question about whether there was anything
20 about what you're testifying about here that says that grooming
21 can only be done for the benefit of the person doing the
22 grooming, to which Dr. Rocchio responded, No, there's not. And
23 then your Honor had asked a series of questions relating to the
24 presence of a third party, what the defense has been referring
25 to as grooming by proxy, which is a different subject matter.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00017940
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document