HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019659.jpg

1.69 MB

Extraction Summary

5
People
7
Organizations
3
Locations
2
Events
3
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Book excerpt / page proof (bates stamped)
File Size: 1.69 MB
Summary

This document is page 171 from a book, likely 'How America Lost Its Secrets' by Edward Jay Epstein (indicated by ISBN in footer '9780451494566' and file prefix 'Epst'). The text discusses the dispute over the number of documents Edward Snowden stole from the NSA, referencing interviews with James Bamford and claims by Glenn Greenwald. It mentions a Defense Intelligence Agency report regarding 900,000 compromised Pentagon documents revealed via a Vice FOIA request. While the file bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' stamp, the content relates to the Edward Snowden leaks, not Jeffrey Epstein.

People (5)

Name Role Context
Edward Snowden Subject / NSA Whistleblower
Discussed regarding the volume of documents stolen from the NSA.
Glenn Greenwald Journalist
Snowden supporter who claimed NSA exaggerated theft numbers; received documents from Snowden.
James Bamford Journalist (Wired)
Interviewed Snowden in early 2014 regarding the number of documents taken.
Rick Ledgett NSA Official
Led the NSA Damage Assessment team.
Laura Poitras Journalist/Filmmaker
Recipient of Snowden's leaked documents.

Organizations (7)

Name Type Context
NSA
National Security Agency; victim of document theft.
Wired
Magazine that published Bamford's interview with Snowden.
Congress
Legislative body to whom NSA executives may have reported.
Defense Intelligence Agency
Produced a damage assessment report.
Pentagon
Source of 900,000 compromised documents.
Vice magazine
Filed a Freedom of Information request in June 2015.
House Oversight Committee
Implied by the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT'.

Timeline (2 events)

June 2015
Vice magazine Freedom of Information request disclosed details about Pentagon documents.
N/A
early 2014
Snowden interview with James Bamford.
Russia (implied)

Locations (3)

Location Context
Location of the NSA base where Snowden worked/stole documents.
Location where Snowden is residing/seeking asylum.
Implied context of government secrets.

Relationships (3)

Edward Snowden Source/Journalist Glenn Greenwald
Greenwald received vast number of NSA classified documents from Snowden.
Edward Snowden Source/Journalist Laura Poitras
Poitras received vast number of NSA classified documents from Snowden.
Edward Snowden Interviewee/Interviewer James Bamford
Snowden told Bamford details in early 2014 interview.

Key Quotes (4)

"According to Greenwald, the NSA vastly exaggerated the magnitude of the theft in order to 'demonize' Snowden."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019659.jpg
Quote #1
"he had purposely left behind 'a trail of digital bread crumbs' at the NSA base in Hawaii"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019659.jpg
Quote #2
"Exaggerating the magnitude of the theft would only magnify Ledgett and the NSA's failure in its mission to protect U.S. secrets."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019659.jpg
Quote #3
"the 'blueprints' of the NSA"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019659.jpg
Quote #4

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (2,465 characters)

The Keys to the Kingdom Are Missing | 171
Snowden's supporters do not accept that he stole such a large number of documents. According to Greenwald, the NSA vastly exaggerated the magnitude of the theft in order to "demonize" Snowden. Snowden also disputed the magnitude of the 1.7 million number. He told James Bamford of Wired in early 2014 that he took far fewer than the 1.7 million documents that the NSA reported were compromised. He offered, however, no more specific details on the magnitude of his theft. Nor did he offer Bamford any way to verify his assertion other than to say that he had purposely left behind "a trail of digital bread crumbs" at the NSA base in Hawaii so that the NSA could determine which documents he "touched" but did not download. A government official familiar with the investigation said no such "bread crumbs" were found by the NSA.
It is possible that the NSA Damage Assessment team under Ledgett falsified its findings or otherwise inflated the number of documents that Snowden stole. NSA executives might have also lied to Congress to exaggerate the loss. But why would these officials engage in an orchestrated deception that made them look bad? Exaggerating the magnitude of the theft would only magnify Ledgett and the NSA's failure in its mission to protect U.S. secrets.
Officials had no reason to demonize Snowden for legal reasons. He already had been. Greenwald and Poitras had already revealed that Snowden had given them a vast number of NSA classified documents on a thumb drive that revealed, as Greenwald put it, the "blueprints" of the NSA. This drive contained, it will be recalled, no fewer than 58,000 highly classified documents. In the eyes of the law, that constituted an unprecedented breach of the laws passed to protect communications intelligence. In any case, in Russia Snowden was not in any jeopardy, no matter how many documents he was said to have stolen. Interestingly, the thirty-five-page Defense Intelligence Agency's damage assessment reports that 900,000 Pentagon documents compromised by Snowden were not made public. That was only disclosed via a Vice magazine Freedom of Information request in June 2015.
Many of the putative 1.3 million documents that the NSA says were copied and moved were duplicate copies. Others were outdated or otherwise useless routing data. So the quantity does not tell the
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 171 9/29/16 5:51 PM HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019659

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document