DOJ-OGR-00020861.jpg
554 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
554 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from February 28, 2023, capturing a conversation between defense attorney Mr. Everdell and the judge. Mr. Everdell is discussing a note from the jury, arguing that it shows they are confused about the instructions for Count Four. Specifically, the jury is questioning whether they can convict the defendant, M. Maxwell, based solely on events that occurred in New Mexico.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| MR. EVERDELL | Attorney |
Speaking on behalf of the defense, interpreting a note from the jury and discussing jury instructions with the court.
|
| M. Maxwell | Defendant |
Mentioned as the individual the jury is considering convicting on Count Four.
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Speaking as the judge, responding to Mr. Everdell's points about a letter and a jury note.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P. C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the page, likely the court reporting service that transcribed the proceedings.
|
| The Court | government agency |
Referenced throughout the document as the judicial body presiding over the case.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2023-02-28
A discussion in court between defense counsel (Mr. Everdell) and the judge regarding a jury note and instructions for Count Four.
Courtroom
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned as the location of events related to Count Four, which the jury is considering.
|
Relationships (2)
Mr. Everdell speaks from the 'defense point of view' about the jury potentially convicting 'M. Maxwell', indicating he is M. Maxwell's defense attorney.
The document is a transcript of a formal discussion between Mr. Everdell (attorney) and the Court (judge) during a legal proceeding.
Key Quotes (3)
"Okay. And so there is the record that you made yesterday at the time the question came. There is the record that you put in the letter this morning that came in late -- early this morning that I reviewed this morning that we just discussed. So, to the extent you're seeking a third bite at the apple, go ahead."Source
— THE COURT
(The judge's response to a request from Mr. Everdell to make a record on a letter.)
DOJ-OGR-00020861.jpg
Quote #1
"I'm simply looking to fill out the record. I understand it's been rejected by the Court."Source
— MR. EVERDELL
(Mr. Everdell's explanation for why he is speaking after the Court has already reviewed his letter.)
DOJ-OGR-00020861.jpg
Quote #2
"One is that the jury is considering whether or not they can convict M. Maxwell on the substantive offense in Count Four based solely on events that took place in New Mexico and traveled to and from New Mexico."Source
— MR. EVERDELL
(Mr. Everdell's interpretation of a note from the jury, outlining the defense's first point.)
DOJ-OGR-00020861.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,670 characters)
Case 22-1426, Document 58, 02/28/2023, 3475901, Page35 of 221
A-235
A-235
LCSCMAXT
3152
3152
1 request of the letter, but if I could make a brief record on
2 that, it will not take very long.
3 THE COURT: Okay. And so there is the record that you
4 made yesterday at the time the question came. There is the
5 record that you put in the letter this morning that came in
6 late -- early this morning that I reviewed this morning that we
7 just discussed. So, to the extent you're seeking a third bite
8 at the apple, go ahead.
9 MR. EVERDELL: I'm simply looking to fill out the
10 record. I understand it's been rejected by the Court.
11 I think from the defense point of view, I think two
12 things are very clear from this note. One is that the jury is
13 considering whether or not they can convict M. Maxwell on the
14 substantive offense in Count Four based solely on events that
15 took place in New Mexico and traveled to and from New Mexico.
16 THE COURT: There are a number of assumptions in that
17 that don't necessarily derive from the meaning of that letter,
18 but I understand that is your position.
19 MR. EVERDELL: Understood, your Honor.
20 And I think the second point is that they are looking
21 at the instructions that they have been given thus far because
22 they reference the second element of Count Four. So they're
23 looking at that instruction and they are unclear, they are
24 confused by those instructions. They are not sure whether or
25 not -- those instructions don't inform them that, in fact,
2 that, it will not take very long.
3 THE COURT: Okay. And so there is the record that you
4 made yesterday at the time the question came. There is the
5 record that you put in the letter this morning that came in
6 late -- early this morning that I reviewed this morning that we
7 just discussed. So, to the extent you're seeking a third bite
8 at the apple, go ahead.
9 MR. EVERDELL: I'm simply looking to fill out the
10 record. I understand it's been rejected by the Court.
11 I think from the defense point of view, I think two
12 things are very clear from this note. One is that the jury is
13 considering whether or not they can convict M. Maxwell on the
14 substantive offense in Count Four based solely on events that
15 took place in New Mexico and traveled to and from New Mexico.
16 THE COURT: There are a number of assumptions in that
17 that don't necessarily derive from the meaning of that letter,
18 but I understand that is your position.
19 MR. EVERDELL: Understood, your Honor.
20 And I think the second point is that they are looking
21 at the instructions that they have been given thus far because
22 they reference the second element of Count Four. So they're
23 looking at that instruction and they are unclear, they are
24 confused by those instructions. They are not sure whether or
25 not -- those instructions don't inform them that, in fact,
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P. C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00020861
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document