DOJ-OGR-00013554.jpg
545 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
3
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
545 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022. It captures a procedural discussion between two attorneys, Ms. Moe and Mr. Pagliuca, and the presiding judge about the government's plan to present documents to the jury without a testifying witness. The Court expresses concerns about the method, and Mr. Pagliuca formally objects to the proposed process.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| MS. MOE | Attorney |
Speaking to the Court about the preference for presenting evidence to the jury.
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Presiding over the case, questioning the attorneys about procedural matters and clarifying the process of presenting ...
|
| Mr. Pagliuca | Attorney |
Questioned by the Court about his objection to the government presenting documents without a witness, and ultimately ...
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the page as the court reporters for the proceeding.
|
| government | government agency |
Mentioned as the party seeking to publish documents and present evidence to the jury.
|
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied location of the court proceeding, as indicated by the court reporting company name.
|
Relationships (3)
Ms. Moe addresses the Court formally as 'Your Honor' while discussing legal procedure.
Mr. Pagliuca addresses the Court formally as 'your Honor' and objects to a procedure outlined by the Court.
They are on opposing sides of a procedural argument in court, with Ms. Moe representing the 'government's' position and Mr. Pagliuca objecting to it.
Key Quotes (4)
"Your Honor, if the Court's preference is for us to, without a person on the stand, just ask the jury to turn from one exhibit to another to another, we can do that."Source
— MS. MOE
(Proposing an alternative method for presenting evidence to the jury.)
DOJ-OGR-00013554.jpg
Quote #1
"But the witness is providing testimony over which they have no personal knowledge. You're simply asking them to do the work of the government in the closing."Source
— THE COURT
(Expressing concern about the proposed method of using a witness with no personal knowledge.)
DOJ-OGR-00013554.jpg
Quote #2
"I don't understand that process, I guess, your Honor."Source
— MR. PAGLIUCA
(Expressing confusion and questioning the proposed procedure of presenting evidence without a witness.)
DOJ-OGR-00013554.jpg
Quote #3
"I do object to that process, your"Source
— MR. PAGLIUCA
(Formally objecting to the Court's described procedure for presenting evidence.)
DOJ-OGR-00013554.jpg
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,338 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 757 Filed 08/10/22 Page 13 of 49 1986
LC9VMAXI
LC9VMAXI
1 law enforcement agent, who had no involvement in the
2 investigation of the case and who isn't providing testimony
3 essentially pursuant to 1006.
4 MS. MOE: Your Honor, if the Court's preference is for
5 us to, without a person on the stand, just ask the jury to turn
6 from one exhibit to another to another, we can do that. I
7 think that is slightly more awkward than facilitating that
8 through a witness and pointing out the connections between two
9 things.
10 THE COURT: Right. But the witness is providing
11 testimony over which they have no personal knowledge. You're
12 simply asking them to do the work of the government in the
13 closing.
14 So, Mr. Pagliuca, do you have any objection to the
15 government publishing a few documents, going to a few points,
16 and then we move on, without a witness?
17 MR. PAGLIUCA: I don't understand that process, I
18 guess, your Honor. We're simply going to -- is this with a
19 witness or without a witness?
20 THE COURT: Without a witness.
21 MR. PAGLIUCA: We're simply going to say, The
22 government would like the jury to look at this and then look at
23 that?
24 THE COURT: Yes.
25 MR. PAGLIUCA: I do object to that process, your
2 investigation of the case and who isn't providing testimony
3 essentially pursuant to 1006.
4 MS. MOE: Your Honor, if the Court's preference is for
5 us to, without a person on the stand, just ask the jury to turn
6 from one exhibit to another to another, we can do that. I
7 think that is slightly more awkward than facilitating that
8 through a witness and pointing out the connections between two
9 things.
10 THE COURT: Right. But the witness is providing
11 testimony over which they have no personal knowledge. You're
12 simply asking them to do the work of the government in the
13 closing.
14 So, Mr. Pagliuca, do you have any objection to the
15 government publishing a few documents, going to a few points,
16 and then we move on, without a witness?
17 MR. PAGLIUCA: I don't understand that process, I
18 guess, your Honor. We're simply going to -- is this with a
19 witness or without a witness?
20 THE COURT: Without a witness.
21 MR. PAGLIUCA: We're simply going to say, The
22 government would like the jury to look at this and then look at
23 that?
24 THE COURT: Yes.
25 MR. PAGLIUCA: I do object to that process, your
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00013554
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document