DOJ-OGR-00001906.jpg
637 KB
Extraction Summary
5
People
4
Organizations
2
Locations
3
Events
3
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
637 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript where a speaker, likely a prosecutor, argues to a judge that the defendant is not being truthful about her financial situation. The speaker highlights the defendant's lifestyle, which seems inconsistent with her disclosed assets, and points to a specific instance of non-transparency regarding a property in New Hampshire. The government is actively investigating this property transaction, having had an F.B.I. agent interview the real estate agent involved.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| the defendant | defendant |
The subject of the hearing, whose finances and transparency are being questioned.
|
| your Honor | judge |
Being addressed by the speaker in a court proceeding.
|
| F.B.I. agent | agent |
An agent who interviewed a real estate agent regarding the New Hampshire property transaction.
|
| a real estate agent | real estate agent |
Was involved in the transaction for the New Hampshire property and was interviewed by the F.B.I.
|
| the buyers | buyers |
The individuals who purchased the New Hampshire house.
|
Organizations (4)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Pretrial Services | government agency |
Received a report from the defendant about her finances and property.
|
| the government | government agency |
Investigating the circumstances surrounding the purchase of the New Hampshire property.
|
| F.B.I. | government agency |
An agent from this organization interviewed a real estate agent.
|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the page, likely the court reporting service.
|
Timeline (3 events)
2020-12-10
A speaker, likely a prosecutor, is addressing a judge about the defendant's financial disclosures.
The government is investigating the circumstances surrounding the purchase of a property in New Hampshire.
New Hampshire
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location of a property transaction being investigated.
|
|
|
A property whose ownership is in question and is central to the discussion.
|
Relationships (3)
The defendant reported her financial situation to Pretrial Services as part of a legal process.
The speaker, likely a prosecutor, is working with an F.B.I. agent on the investigation.
The F.B.I. agent interviewed the real estate agent as part of an investigation.
Key Quotes (2)
"As one example, the defendant told Pretrial Services that the New Hampshire property was owned by a corporation, that she does not know the name of the corporation, but that she was just permitted to stay in the house."Source
— The speaker (paraphrasing the defendant)
(Providing an example of the defendant's lack of transparency regarding her finances.)
DOJ-OGR-00001906.jpg
Quote #1
"It is difficult to believe that that was a forthcoming answer because it is implausible on its face and very confusing..."Source
— The speaker
(Expressing skepticism about the defendant's explanation for her living situation at the New Hampshire property.)
DOJ-OGR-00001906.jpg
Quote #2
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,566 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 93 Filed 12/10/20 Page 29 of 91
k7e2MaxC kjc
k7e2MaxC kjc
simply implausible that the defendant simply has a lump set of
assets and no other stream of income, especially given the
lifestyle that she has been living and as detailed in the
Pretrial Services report. It just doesn't make sense. Either
there are other assets or there is other income. We can't make
sense of this lifestyle and this set of financial disclosures.
This just doesn't make sense. And as I will detail in a
moment, your Honor, it is inconsistent with the limited
reference we have been able to obtain as we have been making an
effort to trace the defendant's finances.
On that subject, your Honor, the report does raise
concerns about whether the defendant has been fully transparent
about her finances. As one example, the defendant told
Pretrial Services that the New Hampshire property was owned by
a corporation, that she does not know the name of the
corporation, but that she was just permitted to stay in the
house. It is difficult to believe that that was a forthcoming
answer because it is implausible on its face and very
confusing, but the government has continued to investigate the
circumstances surrounding the purchase of that New Hampshire
property.
This morning, your Honor, I spoke with an F.B.I. agent
who recently interviewed a real estate agent involved in that
transaction in New Hampshire. The real estate agent told the
F.B.I. that the buyers to the house introduced themselves to
assets and no other stream of income, especially given the
lifestyle that she has been living and as detailed in the
Pretrial Services report. It just doesn't make sense. Either
there are other assets or there is other income. We can't make
sense of this lifestyle and this set of financial disclosures.
This just doesn't make sense. And as I will detail in a
moment, your Honor, it is inconsistent with the limited
reference we have been able to obtain as we have been making an
effort to trace the defendant's finances.
On that subject, your Honor, the report does raise
concerns about whether the defendant has been fully transparent
about her finances. As one example, the defendant told
Pretrial Services that the New Hampshire property was owned by
a corporation, that she does not know the name of the
corporation, but that she was just permitted to stay in the
house. It is difficult to believe that that was a forthcoming
answer because it is implausible on its face and very
confusing, but the government has continued to investigate the
circumstances surrounding the purchase of that New Hampshire
property.
This morning, your Honor, I spoke with an F.B.I. agent
who recently interviewed a real estate agent involved in that
transaction in New Hampshire. The real estate agent told the
F.B.I. that the buyers to the house introduced themselves to
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00001906
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document