DOJ-OGR-00013203.jpg

451 KB

Extraction Summary

6
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 451 KB
Summary

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn by an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca. The questioning focuses on paragraphs 206 and 207 of a complaint, with specific mentions of Ghislaine Maxwell and Sarah Kellen. The witness denies that paragraph 207, which mentions Sarah Kellen, was about engaging her in prostitution.

People (6)

Name Role Context
Carolyn Witness
A witness undergoing cross-examination.
THE COURT Judge
Presiding over the legal proceeding, instructs the attorney to clarify a question and sustains an objection.
MR. PAGLIUCA Attorney
Conducting the cross-examination of the witness, Carolyn.
Ghislaine Maxwell
Mentioned in a question from Mr. Pagliuca regarding her name not being in paragraph 206 of a complaint.
MS. COMEY Attorney
Makes an objection to Mr. Pagliuca's motion to admit a paragraph into evidence.
Sarah Kellen
Mentioned in a question from Mr. Pagliuca regarding paragraph 207 of a complaint.

Organizations (1)

Name Type Context
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. company
Listed at the bottom of the page as the court reporting service.

Timeline (1 events)

2022-08-10
Cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn by attorney Mr. Pagliuca regarding paragraphs 206 and 207 of a complaint.

Relationships (2)

MR. PAGLIUCA professional Carolyn
Mr. Pagliuca is an attorney conducting a cross-examination of Carolyn, who is a witness.
MR. PAGLIUCA professional MS. COMEY
They are opposing counsel in a court proceeding, as Ms. Comey objects to a motion made by Mr. Pagliuca.

Key Quotes (3)

"This paragraph does not contain the name Ghislaine Maxwell; correct?"
Source
— MR. PAGLIUCA (Question to the witness Carolyn about paragraph 206 of a complaint.)
DOJ-OGR-00013203.jpg
Quote #1
"Paragraph 207, again, this paragraph deals with Sarah Kellen; correct?"
Source
— MR. PAGLIUCA (Question to the witness Carolyn about paragraph 207 of a complaint.)
DOJ-OGR-00013203.jpg
Quote #2
"I don't believe that it was to engage me in prostitution, no."
Source
— Carolyn (Response to a question about paragraph 207 which deals with Sarah Kellen.)
DOJ-OGR-00013203.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,030 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 753 Filed 08/10/22 Page 190 of 264
LC7Cmax6 Carolyn - cross
1 2009; correct?
2 A. Yes.
3 Q. Are you disagreeing with that now?
4 A. Yes.
5 THE COURT: I think the witness is looking at the
6 paragraph. So clarify the question.
7 MR. PAGLIUCA: Okay.
8 Q. Isn't this paragraph 206 of the complaint that you agreed
9 you reviewed and agreed with; correct?
10 A. Yes.
11 Q. This paragraph does not contain the name Ghislaine Maxwell;
12 correct?
13 A. Correct.
14 MR. PAGLIUCA: I move for the admission of paragraph
15 206, your Honor.
16 MS. COMEY: Same objection, your Honor.
17 THE COURT: Sustained.
18 Q. Paragraph 207, again, this paragraph deals with Sarah
19 Kellen; correct?
20 A. I don't believe that it was to engage me in prostitution,
21 no.
22 Q. My question is, is this a paragraph of the complaint that
23 was approved --
24 A. Yes.
25 MR. PAGLIUCA: Move for the admission of paragraph
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00013203

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document