DOJ-OGR-00017951.jpg

620 KB

Extraction Summary

3
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
3
Relationships
2
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 620 KB
Summary

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, where an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, discusses the testimony of Dr. Rocchio. He focuses on the concept of "grooming the environment" and references an article she wrote, "Stages of Sexual Grooming," intending to question her about "hindsight bias phenomena." The Court interrupts to question whether the contents of the entire article are within the scope of the direct examination.

People (3)

Name Role Context
MR. PAGLIUCA Attorney
Speaker in the transcript, questioning or discussing the testimony of Dr. Rocchio.
Dr. Rocchio Expert/Witness
Her testimony and an article she wrote are the subject of the discussion. She testified about "grooming the environme...
THE COURT Judge
Speaker in the transcript, interacting with Mr. Pagliuca about the scope of his examination.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. company
Listed at the bottom of the transcript as the court reporting agency.
government government agency
Mentioned as having elicited testimony and received an article from Dr. Rocchio.

Timeline (2 events)

2022-08-10
Direct examination testimony of Dr. Rocchio is being discussed by Mr. Pagliuca and the Court.
Courtroom
A prior hearing where Dr. Rocchio's article was referenced and she provided testimony.
Courtroom

Relationships (3)

MR. PAGLIUCA professional Dr. Rocchio
Mr. Pagliuca is discussing the direct examination and testimony of Dr. Rocchio in a legal setting.
MR. PAGLIUCA professional THE COURT
Mr. Pagliuca, an attorney, is addressing the judge (The Court) during a hearing.
Dr. Rocchio professional government
Dr. Rocchio provided an article and testimony to the government for the case.

Key Quotes (2)

"grooming the environment"
Source
— MR. PAGLIUCA (Describing a catchphrase and concept from Dr. Rocchio's testimony about perpetrator behavior.)
DOJ-OGR-00017951.jpg
Quote #1
"So you have a theory that everything in any article disclosed is within the scope of the direct?"
Source
— THE COURT (Questioning Mr. Pagliuca's basis for asking about a specific part of an article during the direct examination.)
DOJ-OGR-00017951.jpg
Quote #2

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,571 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 747 Filed 08/10/22 Page 78 of 228 754
LC2VMAX2 Rocchio - Direct
1 Halo effect.
2 MR. PAGLIUCA: So I'm not going to call -- well, I
3 don't think I'm going to call it that, your Honor. But on
4 direct examination, the government elicited testimony
5 specifically about -- and let me get to my notes here so I can
6 be accurate -- grooming the environment was the --
7 THE COURT: Grooming the environment.
8 MR. PAGLIUCA: Yes, "grooming the environment" was the
9 catchphrase, which Dr. Rocchio said was a commonly recognized
10 phenomena used by perpetrators in the service of getting the
11 accusers to victims and building that relationship with trust.
12 This is based on one of the articles that Dr. Rocchio
13 provided to the government and was referenced during the
14 Daubert hearing and relied on by Dr. Rocchio as part of her
15 testimony here today in terms of the five -- you may recall the
16 five stages of grooming that we went through with Dr. Rocchio
17 about an hour ago. That article is called Stages of Sexual
18 Grooming, Recognizing Potentially Predatory Behaviors of Child
19 Molesters, and is disclosed at 3500 material, 3502-018,
20 disclosed to me by the government through Dr. Rocchio. And in
21 that article, there is a discussion at page 9, and they call it
22 the hindsight bias phenomena. And so I am intending to ask
23 her --
24 THE COURT: So you have a theory that everything in
25 any article disclosed is within the scope of the direct?
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00017951

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document