This document is page 13 of a Cowen Collaborative Insights financial report dated February 25, 2019. It analyzes the economics of CBD hemp cultivation, citing budget models from the University of Kentucky, and discusses yields, returns, and variable costs associated with 'plasticulture' farming. The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp, but contains no direct references to Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, or typical associates in the text provided.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Michael Cella | Recipient/Subscriber |
Email address michael.cella@cowen.com appears in the sidebar as the intended recipient of the report.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Cowen Collaborative Insights |
Creator of the report.
|
|
| University of Kentucky (College of Agriculture) |
Published the budget models referenced in the analysis.
|
|
| House Oversight Committee |
Implied by the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024829'.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location of the University providing the data; mentioned in context of farming practices (clones becoming more common...
|
"We note all four of the CBD hemp models indicate a positive return above variable costs per acre while hemp grain and hemp fiber do not reach breakeven due to low pricing for both harvestable components."Source
"72% of variable cost per acre is for clone transplants for 1,500 plants at $5.00 each."Source
"Clones have become more common than seeds in Kentucky as they offer an easy way to produce female plants."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (2,592 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document