DOJ-OGR-00021799.jpg
597 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
3
Organizations
2
Locations
3
Events
1
Relationships
1
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
597 KB
Summary
This legal document is a court opinion affirming the June 29, 2022, judgment of conviction for Ghislaine Maxwell. It provides background information, stating that from 1994 to 2004, Maxwell coordinated and facilitated Jeffrey Epstein's sexual abuse of women and underage girls in the United States. The document also references Epstein's September 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement with the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant |
Mentioned as the defendant whose sentence and conviction are being affirmed. The document states she coordinated, fac...
|
| Jeffrey Epstein |
Mentioned as the individual for whom Ghislaine Maxwell facilitated sexual abuse of women and underage girls. His 2007...
|
|
| Litwok |
Mentioned in a case citation, United States v. Litwok, used to establish the standard for reviewing facts from a trial.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| District Court | judiciary |
The court whose June 29, 2022, judgment of conviction against Maxwell is being affirmed.
|
| USAO-SDFL | government agency |
The entity (U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida) with which Jeffrey Epstein entered a Non-Pro...
|
| Government | government agency |
Mentioned in a footnote, stating that the facts of the case are described in the light most favorable to the Government.
|
Timeline (3 events)
1994-01-01
Start of a pattern where Ghislaine Maxwell groomed young women and facilitated Jeffrey Epstein's sexual abuse, which continued until about 2004.
various locations in the United States
2007-09
Jeffrey Epstein entered into a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) with USAO-SDFL following state and federal investigations.
2022-06-29
The District Court's judgment of conviction for Ghislaine Maxwell, which is being affirmed by this document.
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned as the location where Maxwell provided Epstein access to underage girls.
|
|
|
Mentioned in the context of Epstein's NPA, where he pleaded guilty to solicitation of prostitution in violation of Fl...
|
Relationships (1)
The document states that Maxwell "coordinated, facilitated, and contributed to Jeffrey Epstein’s sexual abuse of women and underage girls" and "provided Epstein access to underage girls" from 1994 until about 2004.
Key Quotes (1)
"Because this is an appeal from a judgment of conviction entered after a jury trial, the [ ] facts are drawn from the trial evidence and described in the light most favorable to the Government."Source
— United States v. Litwok, 678 F.3d 208, 210-11 (2d Cir. 2012)
(A quote from a cited case used in a footnote to explain the standard of review for the facts presented in the background section.)
DOJ-OGR-00021799.jpg
Quote #1
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,500 characters)
Case 22-1426, Document 109-1, 09/17/2024, 3634097, Page5 of 26
Indictment. Lastly, we hold that Maxwell’s sentence is procedurally reasonable.
Accordingly, we AFFIRM the District Court’s June 29, 2022, judgment of conviction.
I. BACKGROUND ¹
Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell coordinated, facilitated, and contributed to Jeffrey Epstein’s sexual abuse of women and underage girls. Starting in 1994, Maxwell groomed numerous young women to engage in sexual activity with Epstein by building friendships with these young women, gradually normalizing discussions of sexual topics and sexual abuse. Until about 2004, this pattern of sexual abuse continued as Maxwell provided Epstein access to underage girls in various locations in the United States.
1. Epstein’s Non-Prosecution Agreement
In September 2007, following state and federal investigations into allegations of Epstein’s unlawful sexual activity, Epstein entered into an NPA with USAO-SDFL. In the NPA, Epstein agreed to plead guilty to one count of solicitation of prostitution, in violation of Florida
¹ Unless otherwise noted, the following facts are drawn from the evidence presented at trial and described in the light most favorable to the Government. See United States v. Litwok, 678 F.3d 208, 210-11 (2d Cir. 2012) (“Because this is an appeal from a judgment of conviction entered after a jury trial, the [ ] facts are drawn from the trial evidence and described in the light most favorable to the Government.”).
5
DOJ-OGR-00021799
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document