DOJ-OGR-00016949.jpg
555 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
555 KB
Summary
This court transcript from August 10, 2022, documents a discussion between an attorney, Mr. Everdell, and a judge regarding specific wording changes in a legal document. Mr. Everdell proposes omitting the phrase 'or foreign,' suggests replacing 'an individual' with 'Jane' to specify Count Two, and reiterates a previously overruled objection to the word 'coerced.' The Court accepts some changes while confirming others have been overruled, thereby refining the document's language for the case.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| MR. EVERDELL | Attorney/Counsel |
Speaking to the court to propose and discuss edits to a legal document.
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Presiding over the hearing, responding to Mr. Everdell's proposed edits, and making rulings.
|
| Jane | Individual involved in the case |
Mentioned as the sole subject of "Count Two" for the period 1994 to 1997. Mr. Everdell proposes replacing the term "a...
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Listed at the bottom of the document as the court reporting agency.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-08-10
A discussion between Mr. Everdell and the Court regarding specific wording changes to a legal document for a case, specifically on pages 20 and 21.
Courtroom (implied)
Relationships (1)
The document records a formal dialogue where Mr. Everdell addresses the Court as 'your Honor' within a legal proceeding to discuss edits to a court document.
Key Quotes (3)
"Count Two relates solely to Jane during the time period 1994 to 1997,"Source
— Unidentified Speaker (quoted)
(A phrase being added to a document to clarify the scope of Count Two.)
DOJ-OGR-00016949.jpg
Quote #1
"we would propose replacing "an individual" with the word "Jane.""Source
— MR. EVERDELL
(Proposing an edit on page 21, while acknowledging that the court has already overruled this suggestion.)
DOJ-OGR-00016949.jpg
Quote #2
"On line 6 we would just reiterate our objection to the word "coerced." I understand that's been overruled."Source
— MR. EVERDELL
(Formally restating an objection for the record, despite it having been previously overruled by the court.)
DOJ-OGR-00016949.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,382 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 765 Filed 08/10/22 Page 23 of 95 2761
LCI1MAX1
1 usefulness of line 11, which states expressly Count Two, and
2 I'll add, "Count Two relates solely to Jane during the time
3 period 1994 to 1997," for the reason indicated. Because the
4 conspiracy count requires looking back to the substantive count
5 for the object of the conspiracy.
6 I won't adopt the requested change within the
7 statement of the elements.
8 Anything else on page 20?
9 MR. EVERDELL: With the addition of solely, your
10 Honor, on line 11, there is just, on line 7, another "or
11 foreign" that we need to omit.
12 THE COURT: Okay. Thank you. So from the second
13 element, page 20, line 7, the sentence that begins with
14 "Second," cutting "or foreign." Okay.
15 MR. EVERDELL: Page 21, your Honor. On line 4, I'll
16 just reiterate, I understand this has been overruled by the
17 Court but we would propose replacing "an individual" with the
18 word "Jane." On line 5, there is "or foreign," which should be
19 omitted.
20 THE COURT: Thank you. Page 21, line 5, "to travel in
21 interstate commerce," cutting "or foreign."
22 Okay.
23 MR. EVERDELL: On line 6 we would just reiterate our
24 objection to the word "coerced." I understand that's been
25 overruled. But then, your Honor, generally I would say the
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00016949
LCI1MAX1
1 usefulness of line 11, which states expressly Count Two, and
2 I'll add, "Count Two relates solely to Jane during the time
3 period 1994 to 1997," for the reason indicated. Because the
4 conspiracy count requires looking back to the substantive count
5 for the object of the conspiracy.
6 I won't adopt the requested change within the
7 statement of the elements.
8 Anything else on page 20?
9 MR. EVERDELL: With the addition of solely, your
10 Honor, on line 11, there is just, on line 7, another "or
11 foreign" that we need to omit.
12 THE COURT: Okay. Thank you. So from the second
13 element, page 20, line 7, the sentence that begins with
14 "Second," cutting "or foreign." Okay.
15 MR. EVERDELL: Page 21, your Honor. On line 4, I'll
16 just reiterate, I understand this has been overruled by the
17 Court but we would propose replacing "an individual" with the
18 word "Jane." On line 5, there is "or foreign," which should be
19 omitted.
20 THE COURT: Thank you. Page 21, line 5, "to travel in
21 interstate commerce," cutting "or foreign."
22 Okay.
23 MR. EVERDELL: On line 6 we would just reiterate our
24 objection to the word "coerced." I understand that's been
25 overruled. But then, your Honor, generally I would say the
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00016949
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document