DOJ-OGR-00016460.jpg
628 KB
Extraction Summary
5
People
1
Organizations
1
Locations
4
Events
2
Relationships
1
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
628 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript of a legal argument asserting the defendant's guilt on two theories. The first is that the defendant personally exerted coercive control over a victim named Jane, leading to her sexual abuse. The second theory is that the defendant is also guilty of aiding and abetting Jeffrey Epstein by knowingly facilitating his abuse of Jane, being present on the plane and in the room in New York where the abuse occurred.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Jane | Victim/Witness |
Mentioned as the victim of coercive control, sexual abuse, and enticement to travel to New York. Her testimony is cit...
|
| Dr. Rocchio | Witness |
His testimony, in combination with Jane's, is presented as evidence that the defendant had a relationship of coercive...
|
| Jeffrey Epstein |
Mentioned as the individual who enticed, persuaded, induced, and coerced Jane to travel to New York. The defendant is...
|
|
| The defendant | Defendant |
The subject of the legal argument, accused of exercising coercive control over Jane, sexually abusing her, and aiding...
|
| Your Honor | Judge |
The judge being addressed by the speaker in the court proceeding.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Listed at the bottom of the page, likely the court reporting service that transcribed the proceedings.
|
Timeline (4 events)
The defendant took Jane on field trips.
The defendant knowingly associated with and facilitated the abuse of Jane over multiple years.
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
The destination Jane was made to travel to, and the location where the abuse occurred in a room.
|
Relationships (2)
The document alleges the defendant was in a "relationship of coercive control with Jane," "personally engaged in sexual abuse of Jane," and engaged in a "course of conduct... with Jane over many years."
The document argues the defendant is guilty under an "aiding and abetting theory" for facilitating Epstein's abuse of Jane, being aware of his plan, and knowingly associating with him over multiple years.
Key Quotes (1)
"And there can be no serious argument that Jeffrey Epstein didn't entice, persuade, induce, and coerce Jane to travel to New York."Source
— Unnamed speaker (likely attorney)
(Part of the argument that the defendant is guilty under an aiding and abetting theory, establishing Epstein's primary role in the crime.)
DOJ-OGR-00016460.jpg
Quote #1
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,610 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 759 Filed 08/10/22 Page 244 of 267 2272
LCAVMAX8
LCAVMAX8
1 with her, talked about sex with her, bought her gifts, took her
2 on field trips. The defendant -- Jane's testimony, in
3 combination with Dr. Rocchio's testimony, would lead the jury
4 to concludes that the defendant was in a relationship of
5 coercive control with Jane, which would have allowed her to
6 exercise control to get Jane to continue to travel to New York
7 where, Jane's testimony is, the defendant personally engaged in
8 sexual abuse of Jane. So those are plenty of reasons why the
9 enticement statute is met as to Jane herself, in light of the
10 course of conduct the defendant engaged in with Jane over many
11 years.
12 But even if the Court didn't readily conclude that
13 that statute was met, the defendant is also charged under an
14 aiding and abetting theory. And there can be no serious
15 argument that Jeffrey Epstein didn't entice, persuade, induce,
16 and coerce Jane to travel to New York. And given that fact,
17 it's quite obvious that the defendant was aware of that plan,
18 given that she was on the plane and in the room in New York
19 when the abuse was happening. And she took steps over multiple
20 years to knowingly associate herself with it and to facilitate
21 it. So that, again, is a separate theory by which the statute
22 is met.
23 And finally, here, I would just remind your Honor, as
24 I'm sure your Honor is already aware, the standard here is
25 remarkably low. All that is required is that taking all
2 on field trips. The defendant -- Jane's testimony, in
3 combination with Dr. Rocchio's testimony, would lead the jury
4 to concludes that the defendant was in a relationship of
5 coercive control with Jane, which would have allowed her to
6 exercise control to get Jane to continue to travel to New York
7 where, Jane's testimony is, the defendant personally engaged in
8 sexual abuse of Jane. So those are plenty of reasons why the
9 enticement statute is met as to Jane herself, in light of the
10 course of conduct the defendant engaged in with Jane over many
11 years.
12 But even if the Court didn't readily conclude that
13 that statute was met, the defendant is also charged under an
14 aiding and abetting theory. And there can be no serious
15 argument that Jeffrey Epstein didn't entice, persuade, induce,
16 and coerce Jane to travel to New York. And given that fact,
17 it's quite obvious that the defendant was aware of that plan,
18 given that she was on the plane and in the room in New York
19 when the abuse was happening. And she took steps over multiple
20 years to knowingly associate herself with it and to facilitate
21 it. So that, again, is a separate theory by which the statute
22 is met.
23 And finally, here, I would just remind your Honor, as
24 I'm sure your Honor is already aware, the standard here is
25 remarkably low. All that is required is that taking all
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00016460
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document