DOJ-OGR-00018932.jpg
570 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
1
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
570 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a legal argument between an attorney, Ms. Moe, and the judge. Ms. Moe is seeking to admit three spiral-bound message books as evidence, arguing they have been properly authenticated and should be admitted despite a hearsay objection, citing that similar evidence was previously accepted in the trial.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Hesse |
Mentioned in the header, likely a witness under direct examination.
|
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Presiding over the trial, speaks on lines 3, 13, and 14.
|
| MS. MOE | Attorney |
Speaking to the court, arguing for the admissibility of evidence on lines 4 and 15.
|
| Your Honor | Judge |
A title used by Ms. Moe to address the court.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the page as the court reporting service.
|
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied by the name of the court reporting agency, "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
|
Key Quotes (4)
"You may be seated. Okay."Source
— THE COURT
(Addressing someone in the courtroom after a witness was excused.)
DOJ-OGR-00018932.jpg
Quote #1
"Thank you, your Honor. These three exhibits are spiral bound message books. As their appearance makes clear, no one could tear an object out or put it in there, and so they are a continuous record."Source
— MS. MOE
(Describing the exhibits she is seeking to have admitted into evidence.)
DOJ-OGR-00018932.jpg
Quote #2
"I didn't hear an authentication objection. It was hearsay."Source
— THE COURT
(Clarifying the nature of the objection to the evidence.)
DOJ-OGR-00018932.jpg
Quote #3
"With respect to hearsay, these are admissible for the same reasons the other message pads are admissible and received. They are phone messages that record the date and time of a person calling."Source
— MS. MOE
(Arguing against the hearsay objection by citing precedent from earlier in the trial.)
DOJ-OGR-00018932.jpg
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,396 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 755 Filed 08/10/22 Page 70 of 262 1775
LC8Cmax3 Hesse - direct
LC8Cmax3 Hesse - direct
1 (Jury not present)
2 (Witness excused)
3 THE COURT: You may be seated. Okay.
4 MS. MOE: Thank you, your Honor. These three exhibits
5 are spiral bound message books. As their appearance makes
6 clear, no one could tear an object out or put it in there, and
7 so they are a continuous record.
8 Your Honor, this witness has authenticated these
9 message books in the same manner that a previous witness has
10 also authenticated other message books, and they were admitted
11 exactly the same way earlier in a trial.
12 With respect to rule 901 --
13 THE COURT: I didn't hear an authentication objection.
14 It was hearsay.
15 MS. MOE: With respect to hearsay, these are
16 admissible for the same reasons the other message pads are
17 admissible and received. They are phone messages that record
18 the date and time of a person calling.
19 With respect to particular victims that are in those
20 messages, that would be a prior consistent statement to the
21 extent the witness testified.
22 Your Honor, there are already message pads that are
23 already in evidence that were not objected to on hearsay
24 grounds. So they are in the record. These are of a similar
25 nature. We are simply offering an additional set in the same
2 (Witness excused)
3 THE COURT: You may be seated. Okay.
4 MS. MOE: Thank you, your Honor. These three exhibits
5 are spiral bound message books. As their appearance makes
6 clear, no one could tear an object out or put it in there, and
7 so they are a continuous record.
8 Your Honor, this witness has authenticated these
9 message books in the same manner that a previous witness has
10 also authenticated other message books, and they were admitted
11 exactly the same way earlier in a trial.
12 With respect to rule 901 --
13 THE COURT: I didn't hear an authentication objection.
14 It was hearsay.
15 MS. MOE: With respect to hearsay, these are
16 admissible for the same reasons the other message pads are
17 admissible and received. They are phone messages that record
18 the date and time of a person calling.
19 With respect to particular victims that are in those
20 messages, that would be a prior consistent statement to the
21 extent the witness testified.
22 Your Honor, there are already message pads that are
23 already in evidence that were not objected to on hearsay
24 grounds. So they are in the record. These are of a similar
25 nature. We are simply offering an additional set in the same
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00018932
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document