DOJ-OGR-00013215.jpg
545 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
545 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a discussion between an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, and the judge during the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn. The conversation centers on the consistency of paragraph 206 of an exhibit, which describes allegations against Epstein, with prior testimony. The Court ultimately rules that the paragraph is not inconsistent and sustains an objection.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Epstein | wealthy financier |
Mentioned in a paragraph being discussed, described as using his wealth and network to exploit a minor.
|
| MR. PAGLIUCA | Attorney |
A speaker in the transcript, arguing a point to the court regarding an exhibit.
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
A speaker in the transcript, presiding over the hearing and making a ruling on an objection.
|
| Carolyn | Witness |
Mentioned in the header as being under cross-examination ("Carolyn - cross").
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the transcript as the court reporting agency.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-08-10
A cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn, during which counsel (Mr. Pagliuca) and the judge (The Court) discuss the admissibility and consistency of paragraph 206 of an exhibit.
Courtroom
Relationships (2)
Their interaction as attorney and judge during a court proceeding, as documented in the transcript.
The document refers to Epstein's "network of assistants and employees".
Key Quotes (3)
"Epstein's a wealthy financier with a lavish home, wealth, a network of assistants and employees used his resource and influence over a vulnerable minor child to engage in a systematic pattern of sexually exploited behavior."Source
— Unknown (read from a document)
(A statement from paragraph 12 of a document being discussed in court.)
DOJ-OGR-00013215.jpg
Quote #1
"I don't think that paragraph is factually inconsistent with the testimony for precisely the reason I've just indicated."Source
— THE COURT
(The judge's reasoning for their ruling on paragraph 206.)
DOJ-OGR-00013215.jpg
Quote #2
"So 206 is not inconsistent. Therefore, the objection is sustained."Source
— THE COURT
(The judge's final ruling on the matter of paragraph 206.)
DOJ-OGR-00013215.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,345 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 753 Filed 08/10/22 Page 202 of 264
LC7Cmax6 Carolyn - cross
LC7Cmax6 Carolyn - cross
1 illegal acts. And then if you turn back to 12, 12 says,
2 Epstein's a wealthy financier with a lavish home, wealth, a
3 network of assistants and employees used his resource and
4 influence over a vulnerable minor child to engage in a
5 systematic pattern of sexually exploited behavior.
6 I mean, on its terms, it references additional people.
7 And so, on its face, it's not exclusive and I think that puts
8 it in a different position.
9 MR. PAGLIUCA: Your Honor, with regard to this
10 exhibit, I was simply offering discrete factual paragraphs.
11 THE COURT: Right. But 206 -- so 206 was the one that
12 we began with. I don't think that paragraph is factually
13 inconsistent with the testimony for precisely the reason I've
14 just indicated.
15 MR. PAGLIUCA: I think we left off with 206.
16 THE COURT: So what's the next paragraph?
17 MR. PAGLIUCA: I mean, I can go through it and tell
18 you all the paragraphs that I'm intending to introduce or
19 ask --
20 THE COURT: So 206 is not inconsistent. Therefore,
21 the objection is sustained.
22 What's the next paragraph?
23 MR. PAGLIUCA: Well, let me look at 206 and hopefully
24 respond to that.
25 THE COURT: That's fine.
2 Epstein's a wealthy financier with a lavish home, wealth, a
3 network of assistants and employees used his resource and
4 influence over a vulnerable minor child to engage in a
5 systematic pattern of sexually exploited behavior.
6 I mean, on its terms, it references additional people.
7 And so, on its face, it's not exclusive and I think that puts
8 it in a different position.
9 MR. PAGLIUCA: Your Honor, with regard to this
10 exhibit, I was simply offering discrete factual paragraphs.
11 THE COURT: Right. But 206 -- so 206 was the one that
12 we began with. I don't think that paragraph is factually
13 inconsistent with the testimony for precisely the reason I've
14 just indicated.
15 MR. PAGLIUCA: I think we left off with 206.
16 THE COURT: So what's the next paragraph?
17 MR. PAGLIUCA: I mean, I can go through it and tell
18 you all the paragraphs that I'm intending to introduce or
19 ask --
20 THE COURT: So 206 is not inconsistent. Therefore,
21 the objection is sustained.
22 What's the next paragraph?
23 MR. PAGLIUCA: Well, let me look at 206 and hopefully
24 respond to that.
25 THE COURT: That's fine.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00013215
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document