DOJ-OGR-00016990.jpg

596 KB

Extraction Summary

4
People
1
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
3
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 596 KB
Summary

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a discussion between the judge and attorneys. The judge notes the defense's strategy of questioning witnesses about victims' ages to challenge whether the defendant, Ms. Maxwell, had knowledge of their ages. An attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, begins to raise a related evidentiary issue concerning testimony about multiple females at Palm Beach.

People (4)

Name Role Context
Ms. Maxwell Subject of legal proceedings
Discussed in the context of her knowledge of the 'relevant ages' of alleged victims.
MS. STERNHEIM Attorney
Speaking in court, addressing the Judge.
Judge Judicial officer
Addressed by Ms. Sternheim and presiding over the court proceedings as 'THE COURT'.
MR. PAGLIUCA Attorney
Speaking in court, raising an 'evidentiary issue'.

Organizations (1)

Name Type Context
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. company
Listed at the bottom of the page, likely the court reporting service that transcribed the document.

Timeline (1 events)

2022-08-10
A discussion in court regarding the defense's strategy of questioning witnesses on their perception of ages to challenge the knowledge element of the charges against Ms. Maxwell. An evidentiary issue regarding testimony about events in Palm Beach was also raised.
Courtroom

Locations (1)

Location Context
Mentioned as a location where there was testimony about 'multiple females being'.

Relationships (3)

MS. STERNHEIM professional Judge
Ms. Sternheim addresses the Judge directly in a formal court setting.
MR. PAGLIUCA professional Judge
Mr. Pagliuca speaks during the court proceedings, responding to and addressing the court.
Ms. Maxwell legal THE COURT
Ms. Maxwell is the subject of the legal proceedings over which the Court is presiding.

Key Quotes (3)

"So the defense has questioned multiple witnesses on their perceptions of individual ages, of relevant individuals' ages, so that puts into question the knowledge element with respect to ages..."
Source
— THE COURT (The judge summarizing the defense's line of questioning and its legal implication.)
DOJ-OGR-00016990.jpg
Quote #1
"May we have a moment, Judge?"
Source
— MS. STERNHEIM (Requesting a pause in the proceedings.)
DOJ-OGR-00016990.jpg
Quote #2
"One that I view as an evidentiary issue with the indictment and the evidence in the case is that there was testimony about multiple females being at the Palm Beach"
Source
— MR. PAGLIUCA (Raising a concern about evidence presented in the case.)
DOJ-OGR-00016990.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,529 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 765 Filed 08/10/22 Page 64 of 95
LCIAMAX2ps
2802
1 record that relates to that topic. So I think that --
2 THE COURT: So the defense has questioned multiple
3 witnesses on their perceptions of individual ages, of relevant
4 individuals' ages, so that puts into question the knowledge
5 element with respect to ages, and it's true there's testimony
6 from each of the alleged victims as to what they told
7 Ms. Maxwell, but of course I don't know whether the jury will
8 accept that testimony or not, or any of those individual pieces
9 of testimony. So it seems like having -- the question here is
10 whether there are specific elements, knowledge elements that
11 are in issue, either because it's what some of the evidence
12 goes to or because the defense has made cross-points or will
13 make arguments regarding that. I mean, I don't suppose it's
14 the case that the defense won't -- will it not argue during
15 closing anything with respect to whether Ms. Maxwell knew of
16 the relevant ages?
17 MS. STERNHEIM: May we have a moment, Judge?
18 THE COURT: Sure.
19 MR. PAGLIUCA: Here's the -- I'm going to try to
20 address -- there's a larger concern. I need to break this into
21 two pieces.
22 THE COURT: OK.
23 MR. PAGLIUCA: One that I view as an evidentiary issue
24 with the indictment and the evidence in the case is that there
25 was testimony about multiple females being at the Palm Beach
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00016990

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document