This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a discussion between the judge and attorneys. The judge notes the defense's strategy of questioning witnesses about victims' ages to challenge whether the defendant, Ms. Maxwell, had knowledge of their ages. An attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, begins to raise a related evidentiary issue concerning testimony about multiple females at Palm Beach.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Maxwell | Subject of legal proceedings |
Discussed in the context of her knowledge of the 'relevant ages' of alleged victims.
|
| MS. STERNHEIM | Attorney |
Speaking in court, addressing the Judge.
|
| Judge | Judicial officer |
Addressed by Ms. Sternheim and presiding over the court proceedings as 'THE COURT'.
|
| MR. PAGLIUCA | Attorney |
Speaking in court, raising an 'evidentiary issue'.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the page, likely the court reporting service that transcribed the document.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned as a location where there was testimony about 'multiple females being'.
|
"So the defense has questioned multiple witnesses on their perceptions of individual ages, of relevant individuals' ages, so that puts into question the knowledge element with respect to ages..."Source
"May we have a moment, Judge?"Source
"One that I view as an evidentiary issue with the indictment and the evidence in the case is that there was testimony about multiple females being at the Palm Beach"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,529 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document