DOJ-OGR-00014855.jpg
611 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
3
Organizations
2
Locations
3
Events
1
Relationships
1
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
611 KB
Summary
This legal document is a court opinion affirming the June 29, 2022, judgment of conviction against Ghislaine Maxwell. The background section details Maxwell's role in coordinating and facilitating Jeffrey Epstein's sexual abuse of young women and underage girls from 1994 until about 2004. It also mentions Epstein's September 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement with the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant |
Mentioned as the defendant whose sentence and judgment of conviction are being affirmed. The document states she coor...
|
| Jeffrey Epstein |
Mentioned as the individual for whom Ghislaine Maxwell facilitated sexual abuse of women and underage girls. He enter...
|
|
| Litwok |
Mentioned in the case citation 'United States v. Litwok', which is used to support the standard of reviewing facts in...
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| District Court | Government agency |
The court whose June 29, 2022, judgment of conviction against Maxwell is being affirmed.
|
| USAO-SDFL | Government agency |
The U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida, with which Jeffrey Epstein entered into a Non-Prosec...
|
| Government | Government agency |
Mentioned in a footnote, stating that the facts of the case are described in the light most favorable to the Governme...
|
Timeline (3 events)
1994-01-01
Ghislaine Maxwell began grooming young women for sexual activity with Jeffrey Epstein.
United States
2007-09-01
Jeffrey Epstein entered into a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) with USAO-SDFL.
2022-06-29
The District Court issued a judgment of conviction for Ghislaine Maxwell.
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned as the location where Maxwell provided Epstein access to underage girls.
|
|
|
Mentioned in relation to Epstein pleading guilty to solicitation of prostitution in violation of Florida law as part ...
|
Relationships (1)
The document states that "Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell coordinated, facilitated, and contributed to Jeffrey Epstein’s sexual abuse of women and underage girls" and "Maxwell provided Epstein access to underage girls".
Key Quotes (1)
"Because this is an appeal from a judgment of conviction entered after a jury trial, the [ ] facts are drawn from the trial evidence and described in the light most favorable to the Government."Source
— United States v. Litwok, 678 F.3d 208, 210-11 (2d Cir. 2012)
(A quote from a previous case cited in a footnote to explain the standard of review for the facts presented in the background section of the document.)
DOJ-OGR-00014855.jpg
Quote #1
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,502 characters)
Case 20-cr-00330-PAE Document 1780-2 Filed 12/02/22 Page 5 of 26
Indictment. Lastly, we hold that Maxwell’s sentence is procedurally reasonable.
Accordingly, we AFFIRM the District Court’s June 29, 2022, judgment of conviction.
I. BACKGROUND ¹
Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell coordinated, facilitated, and contributed to Jeffrey Epstein’s sexual abuse of women and underage girls. Starting in 1994, Maxwell groomed numerous young women to engage in sexual activity with Epstein by building friendships with these young women, gradually normalizing discussions of sexual topics and sexual abuse. Until about 2004, this pattern of sexual abuse continued as Maxwell provided Epstein access to underage girls in various locations in the United States.
1. Epstein’s Non-Prosecution Agreement
In September 2007, following state and federal investigations into allegations of Epstein’s unlawful sexual activity, Epstein entered into an NPA with USAO-SDFL. In the NPA, Epstein agreed to plead guilty to one count of solicitation of prostitution, in violation of Florida
¹ Unless otherwise noted, the following facts are drawn from the evidence presented at trial and described in the light most favorable to the Government. See United States v. Litwok, 678 F.3d 208, 210-11 (2d Cir. 2012) (“Because this is an appeal from a judgment of conviction entered after a jury trial, the [ ] facts are drawn from the trial evidence and described in the light most favorable to the Government.”).
5
DOJ-OGR-00014855
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document