DOJ-OGR-00013549.jpg
632 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
1
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
0
Relationships
1
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
632 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a conversation between a judge and Ms. Moe. Ms. Moe explains the rationale for presenting testimony about message pads, stating its purpose is to demonstrate to the jury that various entries with name variations like 'Carolyn' and 'Caroline' all refer to the same person, based on the continuity of associated phone numbers. This testimony is intended to connect different pieces of evidence for the jury.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Speaker in the transcript, questioning Ms. Moe about the purpose of testimony.
|
| Ms. Moe | Unknown, likely attorney |
Speaker in the transcript, explaining the purpose of testimony regarding message pads to the court.
|
| Carolyn |
Mentioned as the subject of entries in message pads. The testimony aims to prove that entries for 'Carolyn', 'Carolin...
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Listed at the bottom of the transcript, likely the court reporting agency.
|
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied by the name of the court reporting agency, 'SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.'
|
Key Quotes (1)
"And reviewing them and analyzing them makes it clear throughout the books and across a variety of different dates that we're talking about the same person. And so that facilitates both publishing the exhibits so that the jury can see them for the first time, and doing that in a way that sort of connects up those different exhibits. And so that's the purpose of that testimony."Source
— MS. MOE
(Explaining to the judge why testimony is necessary to link different message pad entries to a single individual named Carolyn.)
DOJ-OGR-00013549.jpg
Quote #1
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,536 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 757 Filed 08/10/22 Page 8 of 49 1981
LC9VMAXT
LC9VMAXT
doesn't exceed the scope of the ordinary practice.
THE COURT: Let's take the specific example that
you've given on message pads. So just give me an example of
the kind of testimony he would provide there.
you've given on message pads. So just give me an example of
the kind of testimony he would provide there.
MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor.
So, for example, within the message pads, we published
yesterday, I think, just either two or three specific messages
that had a first and last name of someone and a phone number.
But elsewhere throughout the message pads, there appear entries
that only have a first name, and sometimes that entry is, for
example, Carolyn and sometimes it's Caroline. But when you
compare the phone numbers -- and there are a variety of
different phone numbers throughout the book -- it becomes clear
that Caroline is the same Carolyn, first and last name, as some
of the other messages, because there's continuity between the
phone numbers.
yesterday, I think, just either two or three specific messages
that had a first and last name of someone and a phone number.
But elsewhere throughout the message pads, there appear entries
that only have a first name, and sometimes that entry is, for
example, Carolyn and sometimes it's Caroline. But when you
compare the phone numbers -- and there are a variety of
different phone numbers throughout the book -- it becomes clear
that Caroline is the same Carolyn, first and last name, as some
of the other messages, because there's continuity between the
phone numbers.
And there are a variety of different phone numbers
throughout the exhibits with different names like Carolyn,
Caroline, and Carolyn with a last name. And reviewing them and
analyzing them makes it clear throughout the books and across a
variety of different dates that we're talking about the same
person. And so that facilitates both publishing the exhibits
so that the jury can see them for the first time, and doing
that in a way that sort of connects up those different
exhibits. And so that's the purpose of that testimony.
throughout the exhibits with different names like Carolyn,
Caroline, and Carolyn with a last name. And reviewing them and
analyzing them makes it clear throughout the books and across a
variety of different dates that we're talking about the same
person. And so that facilitates both publishing the exhibits
so that the jury can see them for the first time, and doing
that in a way that sort of connects up those different
exhibits. And so that's the purpose of that testimony.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00013549
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document