DOJ-OGR-00017819.jpg
548 KB
Extraction Summary
7
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
3
Events
2
Relationships
1
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
548 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a conversation between the judge and two attorneys, Ms. Sternheim and Ms. Moe, during a recess. Ms. Sternheim raises a potential issue with the government's next witness, Matt, noting that his prior statements regarding a conversation with another individual, Jane, do not fully align with the direct examination. This suggests a potential challenge to the witness's credibility or the consistency of his testimony.
People (7)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| MS. STERNHEIM | Attorney |
Speaker in the court transcript, conferring with Ms. Moe and addressing the Court.
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Speaker in the court transcript, presiding over the proceedings.
|
| MS. MOE | Attorney |
Speaker in the court transcript, representing the government.
|
| Jane | Witness/Subject of discussion |
Mentioned in the header ("Jane - Redirect") and as a participant in a prior discussion with Matt.
|
| Matt | Witness |
Mentioned as the government's next witness, whose prior statements are being discussed.
|
| Judge | Judge |
Title used by Ms. Sternheim when addressing the Court.
|
| Honor | Judge |
Title used by Ms. Moe when addressing the Court.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Listed at the bottom of the page as the court reporting service.
|
| government | Government agency |
Mentioned by Ms. Moe and Ms. Sternheim as the party offering the next witness, Matt.
|
Timeline (3 events)
2022-08-10
A court hearing, specifically a redirect examination of a witness named Jane, followed by a discussion between the judge and attorneys during a recess.
Courtroom
2022-08-10
Ms. Sternheim and Ms. Moe conferred during a break in the court proceedings.
Court
Relationships (2)
They are opposing counsel in a court case and are documented as having conferred with each other during a break.
Key Quotes (1)
"The issue is that, at least in the 3500 material, the statements that Matt made are not -- they don't dovetail entirely with what went on on the direct examination."Source
— MS. STERNHEIM
(Raising a concern to the judge about potential inconsistencies in the upcoming testimony of the government's witness, Matt.)
DOJ-OGR-00017819.jpg
Quote #1
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,325 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 745 Filed 08/10/22 Page 210 of 264
LC1Qmax6 Jane - Redirect
LC1Qmax6 Jane - Redirect
1 MS. STERNHEIM: Right.
2 THE COURT: Okay. Can you confer?
3 MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor.
4 THE COURT: During the break?
5 MS. STERNHEIM: Of course.
6 THE COURT: Great. I appreciate you raising it, and
7 let me know if there's disagreement. Thank you.
8 MS. STERNHEIM: Will do.
9 THE COURT: We'll break for ten.
10 (Recess)
11 (Jurors not present)
12 THE COURT: Matters to take up?
13 MS. MOE: Not from the government your Honor.
14 MS. STERNHEIM: Just very briefly, Judge. I did have
15 an opportunity to confer with Ms. Moe. I just want to state
16 for the record, with regard to the introduction of prior
17 consistent statements, it is my understanding that there needs
18 to be a similar exactitude as one would have with prior
19 inconsistent statements, and I understand that the government
20 is offering their next witness, Matt, to establish the fact
21 that there was some colloquy discussion between Matt and Jane
22 at an earlier time before this. I have no problem with that.
23 The issue is that, at least in the 3500 material, the
24 statements that Matt made are not -- they don't dovetail
25 entirely with what went on on the direct examination. One
2 THE COURT: Okay. Can you confer?
3 MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor.
4 THE COURT: During the break?
5 MS. STERNHEIM: Of course.
6 THE COURT: Great. I appreciate you raising it, and
7 let me know if there's disagreement. Thank you.
8 MS. STERNHEIM: Will do.
9 THE COURT: We'll break for ten.
10 (Recess)
11 (Jurors not present)
12 THE COURT: Matters to take up?
13 MS. MOE: Not from the government your Honor.
14 MS. STERNHEIM: Just very briefly, Judge. I did have
15 an opportunity to confer with Ms. Moe. I just want to state
16 for the record, with regard to the introduction of prior
17 consistent statements, it is my understanding that there needs
18 to be a similar exactitude as one would have with prior
19 inconsistent statements, and I understand that the government
20 is offering their next witness, Matt, to establish the fact
21 that there was some colloquy discussion between Matt and Jane
22 at an earlier time before this. I have no problem with that.
23 The issue is that, at least in the 3500 material, the
24 statements that Matt made are not -- they don't dovetail
25 entirely with what went on on the direct examination. One
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00017819
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document