HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013693.jpg

2.03 MB

Extraction Summary

19
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
2
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Scientific paper / academic text (evidence file)
File Size: 2.03 MB
Summary

This document is page 193 of a scientific text, likely a book chapter or academic paper, contained within House Oversight Committee records related to Jeffrey Epstein. The text discusses neuroscience, specifically the 'binding problem' and sensory integration, as well as computational physics, nonlinear dynamics, and symbolic dynamics. It references historical research conducted at Los Alamos using the MANIAC II computer and cites numerous scientists including Singer, Ulam, and Metropolis. The document contains no direct information regarding Epstein's financial transactions or social contacts, but likely appears in the evidence due to Epstein's known interest in and funding of theoretical physics and neuroscience.

People (19)

Name Role Context
Singer Researcher/Author
Cited regarding the 'binding problem' (1993)
Bressler Researcher/Author
Cited regarding the 'binding problem' (1995)
Nicolelis Researcher/Author
Cited regarding the 'binding problem' (1995)
Schiff Researcher/Author
Cited regarding the 'binding problem' (1997)
Whittington Researcher/Author
Cited regarding mechanistic models (1995)
Fermi Physicist
Referenced in 'Fermi-Pasta-Ulam' discovery
Pasta Physicist
Referenced in 'Fermi-Pasta-Ulam' discovery
Ulam Mathematician
Referenced in 'Fermi-Pasta-Ulam' discovery
Zabusky Researcher/Author
Cited regarding solitons (1965)
Kruskal Researcher/Author
Cited regarding solitons (1965)
Scott Researcher/Author
Cited regarding nerve conduction (1990)
Stan Ulam Mathematician
Leader of a group at Los Alamos in the early 1960s
Cooper Author
Cited regarding Stan Ulam (1987)
Devaney Author
Cited regarding nonlinear differential equations (1989)
Schuster Author
Cited regarding nonlinear differential equations (1989)
Moon Author
Cited regarding nonlinear differential equations (1992)
Metropolis Researcher/Author
Cited regarding symbol sequences (1973)
Simoyi Researcher/Author
Cited regarding chemical reactions (1982)
Coffman Researcher/Author
Cited regarding chemical reactions (1986)

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
Los Alamos
Research location for Stan Ulam's group
House Oversight Committee
Source of the document (indicated by footer)

Timeline (1 events)

Early 1960s
Research group around Stan Ulam used MANIAC II computer for computational findings
Los Alamos
Stan Ulam Group members

Locations (1)

Location Context
Location of research group in the 1960s

Relationships (2)

Stan Ulam Subject/Biographer or chronicler Cooper
Cooper (1987) cited regarding Ulam's group
Stan Ulam Employment/Research Los Alamos
group around Stan Ulam at Los Alamos

Key Quotes (2)

"The objects of relevance to the discovery of Fermi-Pasta-Ulam are studied as the nonlinear physics of nondissapative wave processes and are called solitons"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013693.jpg
Quote #1
"This means one can “dial” the parameter to generate “words” of sufficient computational complexity to serve as a language."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013693.jpg
Quote #2

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (2,466 characters)

coherent activity. This temporal and phase coherence plays an important role in
current theory of sensory-associative-motor integrative function, how distributed
attributions come together in the brain representation of a single object or process,
in the context of the so-called “binding problem” (Singer, 1993; Bressler, 1995;
Nicolelis, 1995; Schiff et al, 1997). Diffusely distributed neurochemical variables
have been invoked. For example, the role of metabotropic glutamate receptors in
driving the synchronization of interneuronal networks has been suggested as a
mechanistic model (Whittington et al, 1995). The objects of relevance to the
discovery of Fermi-Pasta-Ulam are studied as the nonlinear physics of
nondissapative wave processes and are called solitons (Zabusky and Kruskal,
1965). They have been invoked to model nerve conduction and information
transport in brain (Scott, 1990).
A third counter-intuitive set of accidental computational findings is in an area
of research called symbolic dynamics which involves the universal parameter-
dependent coding language and capacity of nonlinear systems. In the early 1960’s,
a group around Stan Ulam at Los Alamos (Cooper, 1987) used one of the early
“high powered” computers, MANIAC II, to iterate (letting the output of the action of a
discrete time function serve as its input the next time around) simple equations they
called “maps.” These reduced dimensional objects shaped like tents, sine functions
and parabolas can be extracted from and represent the behavior of higher
dimensional, nonlinear differential equations (see Devaney, 1989; Schuster, 1989 or
Moon, 1992 for intuitive descriptions). They varied a parameter, such as the height
of the tent or parabola, to systematically change the period and/or phase (order) of
the symbol sequence (Metropolis et al, 1973). Normalizing the range of values of
the output to [0,1] and transforming the series of values into a binary code, L ≤ 0.5
and R > 0.5, they found an invariant, one parameter dependent, progression of
ordered periods, R, RLR, RLRR…RLLRL…, in all such single maximum maps. This
“U (universal)sequence” has also been found as singly or multiply present in a
variety of real systems, including complicated chemical reactions (Simoyi et al,
1982; Coffman et al, 1986). This means one can “dial” the parameter to generate
“words” of sufficient computational complexity to serve as a language. These
193
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013693

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document