This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a discussion between a judge and two attorneys, Ms. Comey and Mr. Pagliuca. The conversation centers on a foundational objection to an exhibit, specifically a book. The judge recounts the testimony of a witness, Mr. Alessi, who claimed the book in question is a later, thinner version of one he saw while employed by Mr. Epstein.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Alessi | Witness |
Mentioned in the header "Alessi - Direct" and as "Mr. Alessi" being questioned about a book he saw while working for ...
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Speaking with the attorneys, ruling on objections, and clarifying questions and testimony related to witness Mr. Alessi.
|
| MS. COMEY | Attorney |
Interacting with the court regarding the admission of evidence and testimony.
|
| MR. PAGLIUCA | Attorney |
Stating his opposition to conditionally admitting an exhibit.
|
| Mr. Epstein | Former employer of Mr. Alessi |
Mentioned as the person Mr. Alessi worked for when he saw a book that is the subject of testimony.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the page, likely the court reporting service that transcribed the proceedings.
|
"The question I have in mind that drew the foundation objection was, Mr. Alessi, based on your review of this book, do you believe this is the same book that you saw when you worked for Mr. Epstein or a later version after you left?"Source
"And he said, This was a later version of the book after I left, that it was printed probably after I left."Source
"And he said, The book is a lot thinner. Our books"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,489 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document