This document is a transcript from a legal proceeding where a witness, Ms. Brune, is being questioned about her failure to report a 'significant piece of information' to the Court's chambers. The questioner establishes that Ms. Brune had the resources, including an investigative team and a BlackBerry for immediate communication, to act on the information. Ms. Brune states she didn't believe the information was accurate at the time but confirms her team was diligent and would have followed any instructions she gave them.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Brune | Witness |
The person being questioned (answering as 'A') during a direct examination.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| the Court | Government/Judicial |
Mentioned as the entity whose attention could have been brought to a 'significant piece of information'.
|
| investigative firm | Company |
Mentioned as a resource at Ms. Brune's disposal.
|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
The court reporting agency that transcribed the proceeding.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Part of the court system that Ms. Brune could have contacted.
|
"Had I thought that the information was accurate, I would have immediately contacted chambers."Source
"Why the qualifier, Ms. Brune? Bottom line is, you have a significant piece of information. You could have brought it to the Court's attention, then, correct?"Source
"Yes. The team was very diligent."Source
"They worked hard, and they would have done whatever I asked"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,446 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document