This document is a page from a legal filing dated February 24, 2022, showing a screenshot of a deleted tweet from January 4, 2022. In the tweet, a user 'S' (implied to be Juror No. 50) tells '@anniefarmer' that her story was critical to the jury's verdict. The document also states that Juror No. 50 posted about his jury service on Instagram, raising potential issues of juror misconduct.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| S | Twitter User |
Author of the tweet with handle @NycSsddd, implied to be Juror No. 50.
|
| anniefarmer |
Recipient of the reply tweet from user S, with handle @anniefarmer. Also referred to as Ms. Farmer.
|
|
| Juror No. 50 | Juror |
Mentioned as the individual who posted about his jury service on Instagram and is the subject of discussion regarding...
|
| Ms. Osborne-Crawley |
Mentioned as the author of a Tweet that linked to an interview with Juror No. 50.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned in the tweet as the place where the verdict was reached.
|
"Thanks for being brave enough to stand up and share your experience. Your story was critical in how we reached our verdict in that jury room. Thanks for sharing my story 🥰"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (623 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document