DOJ-OGR-00016964.jpg
611 KB
Extraction Summary
6
People
1
Organizations
4
Locations
0
Events
0
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
611 KB
Summary
This document is a transcript from a legal case, likely a hearing or trial. It involves discussion about jury instructions, testimony regarding sexual contact between Jane and Epstein in New Mexico, and the testimony of Kate and Annie. The attorneys, Mr. Rohrbach and Mr. Everdell, are arguing about the relevance of certain evidence and instructions.
People (6)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| MR. ROHRBACH |
Speaking in court
|
|
| MR. EVERDELL |
Speaking in court
|
|
| Jane |
Mentioned in testimony
|
|
| Epstein |
Mentioned in testimony
|
|
| Kate |
Mentioned in testimony
|
|
| Annie |
Mentioned in testimony
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Court reporting service
|
Locations (4)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
New York law
|
|
|
Violation of New Mexico offense
|
|
|
Sexual contact between Jane and Epstein in New Mexico
|
|
|
She traveled to New Mexico
|
Key Quotes (4)
"Your Honor, these instructions do not put before the jury any violation of any New Mexico offense whatsoever above or below the age of consent, so I think there's no risk that the jury is going to convict the defendant based on their concerns about a violation of a New York offense."Source
— MR. ROHRBACH
(Arguing about jury instructions)
DOJ-OGR-00016964.jpg
Quote #1
"That's not really the issue about what instructions to put before the jury. The testimony put before the jury, sexual contact between Jane and Epstein in New Mexico after what we believe is the age of consent in New Mexico, and so if --"Source
— MR. EVERDELL
(Arguing about jury instructions)
DOJ-OGR-00016964.jpg
Quote #2
"That's why, I think, it's the same reason I gave limiting instructions as asked with respect to the testimony of Kate and Annie. I think what I'm hearing you say is, you meant to ask for a limiting instruction at that time?"Source
— THE COURT
(Explaining the reason for limiting instructions)
DOJ-OGR-00016964.jpg
Quote #3
"Well, your Honor, we knew from the proffered 3500s for the other witnesses what they were planning on testifying to, so we were able to request those at the time before the witnesses testified and brief those in limine."Source
— MR. EVERDELL
(Talking about witnesses)
DOJ-OGR-00016964.jpg
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,552 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 765 Filed 08/10/22 Page 38 of 95
2776
LCI1MAX1
1 considered illegal sexual activity for the purposes of their
2 deliberations. It's not as charged in the indictment. We're
3 talking about New York law, so I don't know if that was made
4 clear to the jury.
5 MR. ROHRBACH: Your Honor, these instructions do not
6 put before the jury any violation of any New Mexico offense
7 whatsoever above or below the age of consent, so I think
8 there's no risk that the jury is going to convict the defendant
9 based on their concerns about a violation of a New York
10 offense.
11 MR. EVERDELL: That's not really the issue about what
12 instructions to put before the jury. The testimony put before
13 the jury, sexual contact between Jane and Epstein in New Mexico
14 after what we believe is the age of consent in New Mexico, and
15 so if --
16 THE COURT: That's why, I think, it's the same reason
17 I gave limiting instructions as asked with respect to the
18 testimony of Kate and Annie. I think what I'm hearing you say
19 is, you meant to ask for a limiting instruction at that time?
20 MR. EVERDELL: Well, your Honor, we knew from the
21 proffered 3500s for the other witnesses what they were planning
22 on testifying to, so we were able to request those at the time
23 before the witnesses testified and brief those in limine. I
24 didn't think we -- what we knew about Jane ahead of time was
25 that she alleged that she traveled to New Mexico but that
2776
LCI1MAX1
1 considered illegal sexual activity for the purposes of their
2 deliberations. It's not as charged in the indictment. We're
3 talking about New York law, so I don't know if that was made
4 clear to the jury.
5 MR. ROHRBACH: Your Honor, these instructions do not
6 put before the jury any violation of any New Mexico offense
7 whatsoever above or below the age of consent, so I think
8 there's no risk that the jury is going to convict the defendant
9 based on their concerns about a violation of a New York
10 offense.
11 MR. EVERDELL: That's not really the issue about what
12 instructions to put before the jury. The testimony put before
13 the jury, sexual contact between Jane and Epstein in New Mexico
14 after what we believe is the age of consent in New Mexico, and
15 so if --
16 THE COURT: That's why, I think, it's the same reason
17 I gave limiting instructions as asked with respect to the
18 testimony of Kate and Annie. I think what I'm hearing you say
19 is, you meant to ask for a limiting instruction at that time?
20 MR. EVERDELL: Well, your Honor, we knew from the
21 proffered 3500s for the other witnesses what they were planning
22 on testifying to, so we were able to request those at the time
23 before the witnesses testified and brief those in limine. I
24 didn't think we -- what we knew about Jane ahead of time was
25 that she alleged that she traveled to New Mexico but that
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00016964
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document