DOJ-OGR-00017922.jpg
600 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
0
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
600 KB
Summary
This document is a transcript of a legal proceeding. Mr. Pagliuca objects to testimony, Ms. Pomerantz defends it, and the Court comments on the nature of the testimony in relation to Daubert standards.
People (2)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| MR. PAGLIUCA |
Speaking in court, objecting to testimony
|
|
| MS. POMERANTZ |
Speaking in court, explaining testimony
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Court Reporting Service |
Company providing transcription services
|
Timeline (1 events)
Daubert hearing
Key Quotes (3)
"Your Honor, I'm going to object to this as being outside what's been endorsed for this witness's opinions in terms of the disclosure that was given to us."Source
— MR. PAGLIUCA
(Objecting to testimony)
DOJ-OGR-00017922.jpg
Quote #1
"Your Honor, this is part of her basis of her grooming opinion and delayed disclosure."Source
— MS. POMERANTZ
(Explaining testimony)
DOJ-OGR-00017922.jpg
Quote #2
"It's a little different than what was presented in the Daubert. Just in this moment, that is to say, it's appropriate to describe generally the nature of her"Source
— THE COURT
(Commenting on the testimony)
DOJ-OGR-00017922.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,507 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 747 Filed 08/10/22 Page 49 of 228
LC2VMAX2
Rocchio - Direct
725
1
(At sidebar)
2 MR. PAGLIUCA: Your Honor, I'm going to object to this
3 as being outside what's been endorsed for this witness's
4 opinions in terms of the disclosure that was given to us. This
5 is now a narrative into basically treatment of people as
6 opposed to identifying what is or is not grooming. And that's
7 never been disclosed and we didn't do any Daubert on this. I
8 think it's outside of the opinion.
9 MS. POMERANTZ: Your Honor, this is part of her basis
10 of her grooming opinion and delayed disclosure. This is
11 something that was extensively covered at the Daubert hearing
12 and in the briefing.
13 MR. PAGLIUCA: Her clinical treatment of people and
14 identifying what is or is not grooming was discussed. But now
15 she's getting into anecdotal discussions of treatment of her
16 own patients, I believe, which is inappropriate, A, and B, not
17 disclosed. And I don't think that this can be the subject of
18 expert opinion. This is simple anecdotal testimony about her
19 experience as a clinician.
20 MS. POMERANTZ: Your Honor, she's explaining to the
21 jury the basis of her opinions. This is something that we've
22 litigated already.
23 THE COURT: It's a little different than what was
24 presented in the Daubert. Just in this moment, that is to say,
25 it's appropriate to describe generally the nature of her
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00017922
LC2VMAX2
Rocchio - Direct
725
1
(At sidebar)
2 MR. PAGLIUCA: Your Honor, I'm going to object to this
3 as being outside what's been endorsed for this witness's
4 opinions in terms of the disclosure that was given to us. This
5 is now a narrative into basically treatment of people as
6 opposed to identifying what is or is not grooming. And that's
7 never been disclosed and we didn't do any Daubert on this. I
8 think it's outside of the opinion.
9 MS. POMERANTZ: Your Honor, this is part of her basis
10 of her grooming opinion and delayed disclosure. This is
11 something that was extensively covered at the Daubert hearing
12 and in the briefing.
13 MR. PAGLIUCA: Her clinical treatment of people and
14 identifying what is or is not grooming was discussed. But now
15 she's getting into anecdotal discussions of treatment of her
16 own patients, I believe, which is inappropriate, A, and B, not
17 disclosed. And I don't think that this can be the subject of
18 expert opinion. This is simple anecdotal testimony about her
19 experience as a clinician.
20 MS. POMERANTZ: Your Honor, she's explaining to the
21 jury the basis of her opinions. This is something that we've
22 litigated already.
23 THE COURT: It's a little different than what was
24 presented in the Daubert. Just in this moment, that is to say,
25 it's appropriate to describe generally the nature of her
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00017922
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document