DOJ-OGR-00016665.jpg

585 KB

Extraction Summary

1
People
1
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript
File Size: 585 KB
Summary

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Loftus about her research on false memories. The questioning focuses on her famous 'lost in the mall' study, confirming that about 25% of participants came to remember parts of the fabricated event. The transcript also touches on Loftus's other research, including a published paper, showing that people can resist blatantly false suggestions.

People (1)

Name Role Context
Loftus Witness
The individual being cross-examined about her psychological studies on false memories.

Organizations (1)

Name Type Context
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. Company
The court reporting agency that transcribed the proceeding, listed at the bottom of the page.

Timeline (2 events)

A study was conducted where subjects were presented with true memories from their childhood and one false memory of being lost in a mall. It was suggested that family members had relayed this false memory.
Loftus 24 participants
Loftus published a paper titled 'Reactions to Blatantly Contradictory Information'.

Locations (1)

Location Context
The location of a false memory implanted in subjects during a psychological study.

Relationships (1)

Unnamed questioner Professional / Adversarial Loftus
The document is a transcript of a cross-examination, a legal proceeding where a questioner challenges a witness's testimony and expertise. The questions probe the details and limitations of Loftus's research.

Key Quotes (3)

"And then you presented the subjects with the false memory that the subject was lost in the mall when the subject was five or six years old, right?"
Source
— Unnamed questioner (Describing the methodology of Loftus's 'lost in the mall' study during cross-examination.)
DOJ-OGR-00016665.jpg
Quote #1
"And 25 percent -- about 25 percent remembered some of the false event, which means 75 percent did not, right?"
Source
— Unnamed questioner (Stating the results of the false memory study, highlighting that a majority did not form the false memory.)
DOJ-OGR-00016665.jpg
Quote #2
"We did a study where we tried to give a blatantly false suggestion and people resisted it, yes."
Source
— Loftus (Responding to a question about whether people can be resistant to misinformation, referencing her own research.)
DOJ-OGR-00016665.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,504 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 761 Filed 08/10/22 Page 182 of 246 2477
LCGVMAX5
Loftus - cross
1 Q. Okay. And then you presented the subjects with the three
2 true memories that their parents had told you about, right?
3 A. Yes.
4 Q. And then you presented the subjects with the false memory
5 that the subject was lost in the mall when the subject was five
6 or six years old, right?
7 A. With more specifics, yes, but that's basically correct.
8 Q. And the subject was told that the false memory of being
9 lost in the mall was something that their family members said
10 had happened, right?
11 A. That was strongly suggested in the study, yes.
12 Q. And sometime later, you conducted an interview of the 24
13 participants in that study, right?
14 A. Yeah, we tested them, I guess, a few times.
15 Q. And 25 percent -- about 25 percent remembered some of the
16 false event, which means 75 percent did not, right?
17 A. Correct.
18 Q. Okay. Isn't it true that studies have shown that in the
19 extreme case where participants are given blatantly
20 contradictory suggestions, they are sometimes not susceptible
21 to suggestion or misinformation at all?
22 A. We did a study where we tried to give a blatantly false
23 suggestion and people resisted it, yes.
24 Q. You, yourself, you published a paper called Reactions to
25 Blatantly Contradictory Information, right?
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00016665

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document