This document is a court transcript from a sidebar conversation dated August 10, 2022. Attorneys Mr. Everdell and Mr. Rohrbach are arguing before a judge about whether to allow the impeachment of a witness, Juan Alessi, based on prior inconsistent statements he made to Sergeant Dawson about a burglary. Mr. Everdell argues it is relevant to Alessi's credibility, while Mr. Rohrbach contends it is a collateral matter not central to the trial.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| MR. EVERDELL | Attorney |
Speaker at the sidebar, arguing for the impeachment of Juan Alessi.
|
| Sergeant Dawson | Police Officer |
The police officer who took Juan Alessi's confession after a burglary and authored a report on it.
|
| Juan Alessi | Witness/Suspect |
The individual whose confession and credibility are being discussed. He allegedly gave a statement to Sgt. Dawson abo...
|
| MR. ROHRBACH | Attorney |
Speaker at the sidebar, arguing that the matter of impeaching Juan Alessi is collateral to the trial's central issues.
|
| Your Honor | Judge |
Addressed by both Mr. Everdell and Mr. Rohrbach during the sidebar conversation.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Listed at the bottom of the page, likely the court reporting service that transcribed the proceedings.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned as the location where Sergeant Dawson took Juan Alessi's statement.
|
"This is an entirely collateral matter, your Honor. Whether Mr. Alessi went once or twice to steal $6,300 only goes to his character for truthfulness or at beast, also possibly impeachment by contradiction."Source
"Mr. Alessi put his credibility directly at issue about these very statements when he said, I am going to tell the"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,518 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document