DOJ-OGR-00018323.jpg

619 KB

Extraction Summary

5
People
1
Organizations
1
Locations
3
Events
3
Relationships
2
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 619 KB
Summary

This document is a court transcript from a sidebar conversation dated August 10, 2022. Attorneys Mr. Everdell and Mr. Rohrbach are arguing before a judge about whether to allow the impeachment of a witness, Juan Alessi, based on prior inconsistent statements he made to Sergeant Dawson about a burglary. Mr. Everdell argues it is relevant to Alessi's credibility, while Mr. Rohrbach contends it is a collateral matter not central to the trial.

People (5)

Name Role Context
MR. EVERDELL Attorney
Speaker at the sidebar, arguing for the impeachment of Juan Alessi.
Sergeant Dawson Police Officer
The police officer who took Juan Alessi's confession after a burglary and authored a report on it.
Juan Alessi Witness/Suspect
The individual whose confession and credibility are being discussed. He allegedly gave a statement to Sgt. Dawson abo...
MR. ROHRBACH Attorney
Speaker at the sidebar, arguing that the matter of impeaching Juan Alessi is collateral to the trial's central issues.
Your Honor Judge
Addressed by both Mr. Everdell and Mr. Rohrbach during the sidebar conversation.

Organizations (1)

Name Type Context
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. Company
Listed at the bottom of the page, likely the court reporting service that transcribed the proceedings.

Timeline (3 events)

2022-08-10
A sidebar conversation during a trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) regarding the admissibility of evidence to impeach a witness.
Courtroom
Sergeant Dawson took a Mirandized confession from Juan Alessi at the precinct following a burglary.
precinct
Juan Alessi allegedly went in twice to steal money, on one occasion also attempting to steal a gun.

Locations (1)

Location Context
Mentioned as the location where Sergeant Dawson took Juan Alessi's statement.

Relationships (3)

MR. EVERDELL Professional MR. ROHRBACH
They are opposing attorneys arguing a point of law before a judge during a trial.
Sergeant Dawson Law Enforcement-Suspect Juan Alessi
Sergeant Dawson, a police officer, took a confession from Juan Alessi regarding a burglary.
MR. EVERDELL Adversarial (in court) Juan Alessi
Mr. Everdell is seeking to impeach Juan Alessi's testimony and challenge his credibility as a witness.

Key Quotes (2)

"This is an entirely collateral matter, your Honor. Whether Mr. Alessi went once or twice to steal $6,300 only goes to his character for truthfulness or at beast, also possibly impeachment by contradiction."
Source
— MR. ROHRBACH (Arguing that the details of a prior alleged crime by witness Juan Alessi are not relevant to the central issues of the current trial.)
DOJ-OGR-00018323.jpg
Quote #1
"Mr. Alessi put his credibility directly at issue about these very statements when he said, I am going to tell the"
Source
— MR. EVERDELL (Arguing that the witness's own testimony opened the door to being impeached on his prior statements.)
DOJ-OGR-00018323.jpg
Quote #2

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,518 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 749 Filed 08/10/22 Page 222 of 236 1126
LC3Cmax7 Dawson - cross
(At the sidebar)
MR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, Sergeant Dawson was the police officer who took Juan Alessi's confession after the burglary. He came into the precinct, Sergeant Dawson Mirandized him and took his statement. Juan Alessi denied making some of the statements that we think are clearly reflected in Sergeant Dawson's report.
Among other things, he denied going in twice to steal the money. It's as clearly in the reports that he went in twice and stole money on two occasions. The first occasion he was going to try to steal the gun, he didn't find the gun, said he took money. He went back several weeks later and stole more. I think we're entitled to impeach or to point out and elicit the prior inconsistent statement of Juan Alessi through this witness.
MR. ROHRBACH: This is an entirely collateral matter, your Honor. Whether Mr. Alessi went once or twice to steal $6,300 only goes to his character for truthfulness or at beast, also possibly impeachment by contradiction. But in either sense, it's totally collateral to any of the central issues of this trial. They would not be able to independently prove up any of these facts but for Mr. Alessi having testified.
MR. EVERDELL: It was a Mirandized statement, your Honor. Mr. Alessi put his credibility directly at issue about these very statements when he said, I am going to tell the
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00018323

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document