This document is a page from a court transcript, specifically jury instructions from a case filed on August 10, 2022. The text, labeled "Instruction No. 42," defines and differentiates between direct and circumstantial evidence for the jury. A hypothetical example is used to illustrate circumstantial evidence, involving inferring rain from observing people entering a courtroom with a wet umbrella and raincoat.
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Appears in the footer of the document, likely the court reporting service that transcribed the proceedings.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned in a hypothetical example used to explain circumstantial evidence.
|
|
|
Mentioned in a hypothetical example used to explain circumstantial evidence.
|
"One kind of direct evidence is a witness's testimony about something that the witness knows by virtue of his or her own senses, something that the witness has seen, smelled, touched, or heard."Source
"Circumstantial evidence is evidence that tends to prove one fact by proof of other facts."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,460 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document