This document is a transcript of a legal summation by Ms. Menninger, who is challenging the credibility of a witness named 'Jane'. Menninger points out that Jane failed to identify Ghislaine and other women in a sworn pleading, despite allegedly being with them. She also contrasts Jane's claims of extreme poverty and homelessness with evidence that she and her two brothers applied for an expensive arts camp costing $12,000 per year for three years.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Menninger | Speaker (likely an attorney) |
Mentioned in the header as the person giving the summation.
|
| Epstein | Accused |
Mentioned as a person who had committed or attempted to commit sexual misconduct.
|
| Ghislaine | Alleged participant |
A person whom the witness (Jane) did not identify in an interrogatory response.
|
| Eva | Potential witness/participant |
A name the witness had previously given to the government but not in her sworn pleading.
|
| Michelle | Potential witness/participant |
A name the witness had previously given to the government but not in her sworn pleading.
|
| Sophie | Potential witness/participant |
A name the witness had previously given to the government but not in her sworn pleading.
|
| Jane | Witness/Victim |
The subject of the summation, whose credibility is being questioned.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the page as the court reporting agency.
|
"This is notable not only because she doesn't identify Ghislaine, but she also doesn't identify all these other women who were supposedly in these orgies with her when she was 14 over a three-year period."Source
"That arts camp costs $4,000 per person, per summer, so $12,000 per year, all three of them go all three years."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,686 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document