DOJ-OGR-00022009.jpg
613 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
613 KB
Summary
This document is a transcript from a court hearing on February 10, 2020, for case 1:19-cr-00830-AT. A defense attorney states their intention to file a motion to dismiss the indictment on the grounds of selective prosecution. The attorney also requests discovery materials from an Inspector General's report concerning the same incident, anticipating that this will cause a trial delay, to which the court replies that the issue has already been addressed.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Unnamed defense attorney | Attorney |
The primary speaker in the transcript, arguing for discovery and announcing an intent to file a motion to dismiss.
|
| your Honor | Judge |
Addressed by the defense attorney during the court proceeding.
|
| Unnamed client | Defendant |
Referred to as "my client" by the defense attorney.
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
The speaker who responds to the defense attorney's argument.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Inspector General | Government agency/office |
An Inspector General's report is mentioned as a source of discoverable information sought by the defense.
|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
The court reporting agency that transcribed the proceeding, as indicated at the bottom of the page.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2020-02-10
A court hearing for case 1:19-cr-00830-AT where the defense discussed future motions and discovery requests.
Courtroom
Relationships (2)
The attorney addresses the court formally as 'your Honor' and presents legal arguments.
The attorney refers to 'my client' and argues on their behalf regarding the charges and discovery.
Key Quotes (3)
"high likelihood that I'm going to file a motion to dismiss the indictment based on selective prosecution."Source
— Unnamed defense attorney
(Stating the intention to file a motion to dismiss.)
DOJ-OGR-00022009.jpg
Quote #1
"I have also made a specific request under Rule 16 that the defense wants whatever investigation was done and whatever information there is that is discoverable with respect to the Inspector General's report."Source
— Unnamed defense attorney
(Making a formal request for discovery related to an official report.)
DOJ-OGR-00022009.jpg
Quote #2
"We already addressed that the last time."Source
— THE COURT
(Responding to the defense attorney's argument about discovery and potential trial delays.)
DOJ-OGR-00022009.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,565 characters)
Case 1:19-cr-00830-AT Document 26 Filed 02/10/20 Page 6 of 15
klu2NoeC kjc
klu2NoeC kjc
1 high likelihood that I'm going to file a motion to dismiss the
2 indictment based on selective prosecution. I do believe that
3 if certain portions of that motion are granted, then that's
4 going to entitle the defense to additional discovery that we
5 haven't even received yet.
6 So with the request that we are asking for, we are
7 also having an opportunity to kind of see -- I know kind of the
8 things that are going to happen or potentially will happen, so
9 instead of just trying to come back here three or four times to
10 say this is happening, we can kind of just do this now and
11 realize that that motion will probably be filed. That may
12 create other issues with respect to discovery.
13 Also, your Honor, I have also made a specific request
14 under Rule 16 that the defense wants whatever investigation was
15 done and whatever information there is that is discoverable
16 with respect to the Inspector General's report. It is my
17 position that we are entitled to that information. It is an
18 investigation of the same incident. It is an investigation of
19 the circumstances with which my client is being charged. With
20 that being said, I do think that we are entitled to whatever
21 information was generated in those reports, so I believe that
22 also is going to cause a delay in the trial wherever we go with
23 that issue.
24 THE COURT: We already addressed that the last time.
25 (Pause)
2 indictment based on selective prosecution. I do believe that
3 if certain portions of that motion are granted, then that's
4 going to entitle the defense to additional discovery that we
5 haven't even received yet.
6 So with the request that we are asking for, we are
7 also having an opportunity to kind of see -- I know kind of the
8 things that are going to happen or potentially will happen, so
9 instead of just trying to come back here three or four times to
10 say this is happening, we can kind of just do this now and
11 realize that that motion will probably be filed. That may
12 create other issues with respect to discovery.
13 Also, your Honor, I have also made a specific request
14 under Rule 16 that the defense wants whatever investigation was
15 done and whatever information there is that is discoverable
16 with respect to the Inspector General's report. It is my
17 position that we are entitled to that information. It is an
18 investigation of the same incident. It is an investigation of
19 the circumstances with which my client is being charged. With
20 that being said, I do think that we are entitled to whatever
21 information was generated in those reports, so I believe that
22 also is going to cause a delay in the trial wherever we go with
23 that issue.
24 THE COURT: We already addressed that the last time.
25 (Pause)
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00022009
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document