DOJ-OGR-00019046.jpg
505 KB
Extraction Summary
1
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
505 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, showing the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers. The questioning establishes that Rodgers, likely a pilot or flight crew member, was not always provided with the full names of passengers on flights. Rodgers confirms that passenger names were not considered critical information and that no airline regulations required them to collect this data.
People (1)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Rodgers | Witness |
The person being cross-examined in the court transcript.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Listed at the bottom of the page as the court reporting service.
|
Relationships (1)
The document is a transcript of a legal cross-examination between an attorney (Questioner) and a witness (Rodgers).
Key Quotes (3)
"I think you mentioned that on your direct exam, right, the names of the passengers wasn't one of these sort of critical pieces of information for you to know, right?"Source
— Questioner
(Questioning the witness about the importance of knowing passenger names.)
DOJ-OGR-00019046.jpg
Quote #1
"And there's no requirement under airline regulations that requires you to gather the names of the passengers, right?"Source
— Questioner
(Establishing that there was no formal rule for the witness to collect passenger names.)
DOJ-OGR-00019046.jpg
Quote #2
"That is correct."Source
— Rodgers
(The witness's response, confirming there is no airline regulation requiring them to gather passenger names.)
DOJ-OGR-00019046.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,277 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 755 Filed 08/10/22 Page 184 of 262
LC8VMAX6
Rodgers - cross
1895
LC8VMAX6
Rodgers - cross
1895
1 Q. And but you wouldn't necessarily be told who was going to
2 be on the flight, right?
3 A. That's correct.
4 Q. I think you mentioned that on your direct exam, right, the
5 names of the passengers wasn't one of these sort of critical
6 pieces of information for you to know, right?
7 A. No.
8 Q. Okay. And, in fact, most of the time you didn't ever meet
9 the passengers, right?
10 A. Other than we would know who they were.
11 Q. Sure. If you had passengers, for example, who flew often,
12 you would get to know those people, right?
13 A. Right.
14 Q. All right. But a lot of times you were just at some point
15 given some names of the passengers, right?
16 A. Correct.
17 Q. And you wouldn't necessarily be given all of their names,
18 right?
19 A. No.
20 Q. Sometimes you'd be given some of the names and sometimes
21 you'd be given all, but it was a mix, right?
22 A. That's correct.
23 Q. And there's no requirement under airline regulations that
24 requires you to gather the names of the passengers, right?
25 A. That is correct.
2 be on the flight, right?
3 A. That's correct.
4 Q. I think you mentioned that on your direct exam, right, the
5 names of the passengers wasn't one of these sort of critical
6 pieces of information for you to know, right?
7 A. No.
8 Q. Okay. And, in fact, most of the time you didn't ever meet
9 the passengers, right?
10 A. Other than we would know who they were.
11 Q. Sure. If you had passengers, for example, who flew often,
12 you would get to know those people, right?
13 A. Right.
14 Q. All right. But a lot of times you were just at some point
15 given some names of the passengers, right?
16 A. Correct.
17 Q. And you wouldn't necessarily be given all of their names,
18 right?
19 A. No.
20 Q. Sometimes you'd be given some of the names and sometimes
21 you'd be given all, but it was a mix, right?
22 A. That's correct.
23 Q. And there's no requirement under airline regulations that
24 requires you to gather the names of the passengers, right?
25 A. That is correct.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00019046
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document