EFTA00011147.pdf
64.5 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Email chain
File Size:
64.5 KB
Summary
This document is an email chain between USANYS officials from January 29, 2020, discussing a 'Sharing Order' application. The officials are coordinating the description of new materials received from Epstein's estate attorneys, specifically 'trust and will documents.' They debate whether to explicitly mention 'revocations' in the order, ultimately deciding to include them despite questioning their substantive value.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Redacted Sender/Recipient 1 | USANYS Official |
Sender of the top email, agreeing to include 'revocations' in the order.
|
| Redacted Sender/Recipient 2 | USANYS Official |
Discussing the 'intent to share' specific documents; jokes about not being a T&E (Trust & Estate) lawyer.
|
| Epstein Estate Attorneys | Attorneys |
Mentioned as the source of materials received over the last two weeks.
|
| Paralegal | Legal Support |
Mentioned as someone who could review the description of materials.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| USANYS |
United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (indicated in email headers)
|
|
| Epstein Estate |
Implied via mention of 'estate attorneys' and 'trust and will documents'
|
Relationships (2)
USANYS Staff 1
→
Colleagues
→
USANYS Staff 2
Internal email correspondence regarding legal filings.
USANYS received documents from estate attorneys.
Key Quotes (4)
"I’ve updated the sharing order application to be one to share the additional trust and will documents we have now received."Source
EFTA00011147.pdf
Quote #1
"Remember, I’m not a T&E lawyer. But you are getting to be"Source
EFTA00011147.pdf
Quote #2
"with just a note that it doesn’t appear to include revocations, so to the extent those are intended to be shared, I think that word may need to be added."Source
EFTA00011147.pdf
Quote #3
"I've tried to describe the various materials we have gotten from the estate attorneys over the last two weeks."Source
EFTA00011147.pdf
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (2,088 characters)
From: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
To: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Subject: Re: Epstein Sharing Order Part II
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2020 21:05:59 +0000
To: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Subject: Re: Epstein Sharing Order Part II
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2020 21:05:59 +0000
Yes, I think we should. Thanks for flagging.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 29, 2020, at 3:56 PM, [Redacted] <[Redacted]> wrote:
[Redacted], is it the intent to share those? If so, I’ll just add it to every mention of each document, but if not then it’s unnecessary. I don’t think those are substantive docs but I defer.
From: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2020 15:55
To: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Subject: RE: Epstein Sharing Order Part II
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2020 15:55
To: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Subject: RE: Epstein Sharing Order Part II
Please add it in the right place and send me the order. Remember, I’m not a T&E lawyer. But you are getting to be
From: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2020 3:22 PM
To: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Subject: RE: Epstein Sharing Order Part II
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2020 3:22 PM
To: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Subject: RE: Epstein Sharing Order Part II
Yes, I think this document accurately describes the materials we’ve received, with just a note that it doesn’t appear to include revocations, so to the extent those are intended to be shared, I think that word may need to be added.
thanks,
[Redacted]
[Redacted]
From: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2020 10:40
To: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Subject: Epstein Sharing Order Part II
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2020 10:40
To: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Subject: Epstein Sharing Order Part II
[Redacted] – I’ve updated the sharing order application to be one to share the additional trust and will documents we have now received. Would you take a look when you can?
EFTA00011147
[Redacted] – I’ve tried to describe the various materials we have gotten from the estate attorneys over the last two weeks.
Would you mind taking a look (or asking a paralegal to take a look) to make sure I’ve accurately described/characterized the new stuff we’re looking to share?
Would you mind taking a look (or asking a paralegal to take a look) to make sure I’ve accurately described/characterized the new stuff we’re looking to share?
Thanks,
[Redacted]
[Redacted]
EFTA00011148
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document