DOJ-OGR-00016878.jpg
600 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
1
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
3
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
600 KB
Summary
This court transcript from August 10, 2022, documents a discussion between a judge and two attorneys, Ms. Menninger and Ms. Moe. The conversation centers on the timing of the judge's recent ruling on an application, the failure to enforce a subpoena in a timely manner, and the scope of materials produced as evidence. The attorneys offer to provide further documentation to create a clear factual record for the court's determination.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| MS. MENNINGER | Attorney (implied) |
Speaker in the transcript, addressing the court about an application and offering to email the court's chambers.
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Speaker in the transcript, referred to as 'your Honor', discussing a ruling on an application and the need for a fact...
|
| MS. MOE | Attorney (implied) |
Speaker in the transcript, discussing the production of materials for witnesses and a letter identifying victims.
|
| Jane | Victim (implied) |
Mentioned in the context of materials related to victims in the case.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the transcript as the court reporting service.
|
Timeline (2 events)
2022-08-10
A court proceeding where Ms. Menninger, Ms. Moe, and the Court discuss an application, a subpoena, and the production of evidence.
Courtroom (implied)
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned by Ms. Menninger as the recipient of a potential email to the judge.
|
Relationships (3)
Ms. Menninger addresses the Court as 'your Honor' and discusses legal matters (an application) with the judge.
Ms. Moe addresses the Court to clarify the record regarding materials produced for the case.
Both are speaking to the judge about different aspects of the same legal issue (an application, subpoena, production of materials), implying they represent opposing sides in the litigation.
Key Quotes (3)
"I ruled as fast as I could, which meant last night, I think it was probably after 11:00 p.m. or close to midnight, but thought it was important to give that resolution as soon as I could once the issue was raised and I had full briefing."Source
— THE COURT
(Explaining the timing of a ruling on an application that was due the previous evening.)
DOJ-OGR-00016878.jpg
Quote #1
"I can email chambers as soon as I gather the dates and times of the communication efforts. I can put that in a writing, this way your Honor has a factual record on it."Source
— MS. MENNINGER
(Offering to provide the court with a written record of communication attempts.)
DOJ-OGR-00016878.jpg
Quote #2
"Just with respect to developing a record on this issue, I just want to make sure it's clear that when we produced 3500 materials, we designated them for testifying witnesses, which was a much narrower scope."Source
— MS. MOE
(Clarifying the scope of previously produced materials in the case.)
DOJ-OGR-00016878.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,922 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 763 Filed 08/10/22 Page 149 of 197 2690
LCHCmax5
LCHCmax5
1 MS. MENNINGER: That was an application, your Honor.
2 THE COURT: It was an application. It was an
3 application that you asked to respond to at -- I think it was
4 6 o'clock last night. So I didn't get your response on that
5 until 6 o'clock last night. I ruled as fast as I could, which
6 meant last night, I think it was probably after 11:00 p.m. or
7 close to midnight, but thought it was important to give that
8 resolution as soon as I could once the issue was raised and I
9 had full briefing.
10 Even if there hadn't been an application to preclude
11 that witness, you hadn't taken steps to enforce the subpoena
12 until 11:55 a.m. today. I'm going to look at the materials,
13 but I just want to have the factual record that I need to make
14 a determination.
15 MS. MENNINGER: I can email chambers as soon as I
16 gather the dates and times of the communication efforts. I can
17 put that in a writing, this way your Honor has a factual record
18 on it.
19 MS. MOE: Just with respect to developing a record on
20 this issue, I just want to make sure it's clear that when we
21 produced 3500 materials, we designated them for testifying
22 witnesses, which was a much narrower scope. Accompanied with
23 that, I think, earlier than October, was a letter identifying
24 the particular victims in this case. The materials with
25 respect to Jane talked about the very, very limited number of
2 THE COURT: It was an application. It was an
3 application that you asked to respond to at -- I think it was
4 6 o'clock last night. So I didn't get your response on that
5 until 6 o'clock last night. I ruled as fast as I could, which
6 meant last night, I think it was probably after 11:00 p.m. or
7 close to midnight, but thought it was important to give that
8 resolution as soon as I could once the issue was raised and I
9 had full briefing.
10 Even if there hadn't been an application to preclude
11 that witness, you hadn't taken steps to enforce the subpoena
12 until 11:55 a.m. today. I'm going to look at the materials,
13 but I just want to have the factual record that I need to make
14 a determination.
15 MS. MENNINGER: I can email chambers as soon as I
16 gather the dates and times of the communication efforts. I can
17 put that in a writing, this way your Honor has a factual record
18 on it.
19 MS. MOE: Just with respect to developing a record on
20 this issue, I just want to make sure it's clear that when we
21 produced 3500 materials, we designated them for testifying
22 witnesses, which was a much narrower scope. Accompanied with
23 that, I think, earlier than October, was a letter identifying
24 the particular victims in this case. The materials with
25 respect to Jane talked about the very, very limited number of
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00016878
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document