EFTA00027921.pdf
82.6 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Email thread / legal correspondence
File Size:
82.6 KB
Summary
An email thread between Assistant U.S. Attorneys regarding a draft response to preservation requests from Jeffrey Epstein's defense team. The conversation takes place from August 6 to August 9, 2019, just prior to Epstein's death on August 10. The prosecutors discuss edits and ultimately decide that delaying the response until Monday, August 12, would not be problematic.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Subject |
Mentioned in subject line regarding 'defense preservation requests'
|
| Redacted Sender/Recipient (Aug 06) | Assistant U.S. Attorney |
Author of the initial email in the thread, works for Southern District of New York
|
| Redacted USANYS Staff | Government Officials |
Various participants in the email chain discussing the legal response
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| USANYS |
United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York (email domain/label)
|
|
| Southern District of New York |
Office location mentioned in signature
|
Timeline (1 events)
2019-08-09
Discussion regarding delaying the legal response to Epstein's defense until Monday, August 12.
Email Correspondence
USANYS Staff
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Jurisdiction/Office of the sender
|
Relationships (1)
Drafting response to 'Epstein defense preservation requests'
Key Quotes (3)
"If we don't get this out until Monday is that a problem?"Source
EFTA00027921.pdf
Quote #1
"realistically I don't think the defense can make much more hay about having gotten a response on the 9th versus the 12th"Source
EFTA00027921.pdf
Quote #2
"This has been in the works for a little while... but we didn't want it to get lost given the discovery motion schedule."Source
EFTA00027921.pdf
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (2,866 characters)
From: [Redacted] (USANYS)" <[Redacted]>
To: [Redacted] (USANYS)" <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] (USANYS)" <[Redacted]>; "[Redacted]"
<[Redacted]>; "[Redacted]" <[Redacted]>
Subject: RE: draft response to Epstein defense preservation requests
Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2019 17:21:56 +0000
To: [Redacted] (USANYS)" <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] (USANYS)" <[Redacted]>; "[Redacted]"
<[Redacted]>; "[Redacted]" <[Redacted]>
Subject: RE: draft response to Epstein defense preservation requests
Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2019 17:21:56 +0000
I'm totally available to update it this afternoon if there are edits today, but realistically I don't think the defense can make much more hay about having gotten a response on the 9th versus the 12th
From: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Sent: Friday, August 09, 2019 13:20
To: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Subject: Re: draft response to Epstein defense preservation requests
Sent: Friday, August 09, 2019 13:20
To: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Subject: Re: draft response to Epstein defense preservation requests
If we don't get this out until Monday is that a problem?
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 8, 2019, at 5:56 PM, [Redacted] <[Redacted]> wrote:
No problem, thanks, and the edits were all straightforward. Updated version attached, everything incorporated, and can go to [Redacted] — I’m out of commission the next couple hours but back after that.
thanks,
[Redacted]
[Redacted]
From: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2019 16:36
To: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Subject: RE: draft response to Epstein defense preservation requests
Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2019 16:36
To: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Subject: RE: draft response to Epstein defense preservation requests
Sorry for the delay. Combined edits from both of us, attached. Can you take a look and clean up — we would then like to give [Redacted] at least the option of weighing in before we send to defense counsel.
From: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Sent: Thursday, August 8, 2019 11:44 AM
To: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Subject: RE: draft response to Epstein defense preservation requests
Sent: Thursday, August 8, 2019 11:44 AM
To: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Subject: RE: draft response to Epstein defense preservation requests
Wanted to bump this from Tuesday, especially since I know you guys are out tomorrow — hopefully we can send it out today? Happy to incorporate any edits etc. Thanks.
EFTA00027921
From: [Redacted]
Sent: Tuesday, August 06, 2019 15:01
To: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Subject: RE: draft response to Epstein defense preservation requests
Sent: Tuesday, August 06, 2019 15:01
To: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Subject: RE: draft response to Epstein defense preservation requests
[Redacted],
This has been in the works for a little while, due to various other things that have come up in the interim, but we didn't want it to get lost given the discovery motion schedule. The attached is based on our conversations with [Redacted], including his email with suggested language for the prefatory language, and responds to the two attached defense letters. Happy to discuss anytime and to incorporate comments and suggestions.
thanks,
[Redacted].
[Redacted].
Assistant U.S. Attorney
Southern District of New York
Southern District of New York
<2019-08-08, JE, letter to defense re preservation requests.docx>
EFTA00027922
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document