This document is a page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, from the direct examination of a witness named Rodgers. The transcript captures an exchange where an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, argues against the notion that moving into a smaller apartment implies poverty, an argument the court overrules. The testimony also references a point in time when an unnamed female first met Mr. Epstein.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Epstein |
Mentioned as someone an unnamed female person met.
|
|
| MR. PAGLIUCA |
Speaker in the transcript, likely an attorney, making an argument to the court.
|
|
| Rodgers | Witness |
Mentioned in the header as being under 'direct' examination.
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Speaker in the transcript, issuing a ruling ('Overruled').
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Listed at the bottom of the page as the court reporting service.
|
"There's no foundation for that either."Source
"The fact that somebody moves into a smaller apartment means that they don't have any money? I mean --"Source
"Overruled."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (473 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document