This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022. A witness named Matt is being questioned about his past dating relationship with a woman named Jane and what she told him about her difficult home life as a child. The testimony is interrupted by a hearsay objection from an attorney, Ms. Sternheim, which is then argued by another attorney, Ms. Moe, before the judge makes a preliminary ruling.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Matt | Witness |
A witness undergoing direct examination about his past relationship with Jane.
|
| Jane |
The subject of the testimony; Matt's ex-girlfriend whose home life is being discussed.
|
|
| MS. STERNHEIM | Attorney |
An attorney who objects to a question posed to the witness Matt, citing hearsay.
|
| MS. MOE | Attorney |
An attorney who argues against Ms. Sternheim's objection, providing a legal basis for the question.
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
The presiding judge in the case, who rules on objections and manages the proceedings.
|
| Your Honor | Judge |
A formal title used by Ms. Moe to address the judge (THE COURT).
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
The court reporting agency that transcribed the proceedings, listed at the bottom of the page.
|
"Well, that is hearsay. That is not the basis of this witness's testimony."Source
"Your Honor, it's both the foundation for a prior consistent statement and a prior consistent statement itself."Source
"In light of cross, I think that's right, but I'll hear you if --"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,338 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document