HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032370.jpg

Extraction Summary

7
People
3
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
5
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Email thread
File Size:
Summary

An email thread from November 14, 2016, between New York Times financial reporter Landon Thomas Jr. and Jeffrey Epstein regarding the aftermath of the Trump election. Thomas asks Epstein for intelligence on the Treasury Secretary appointment and discusses how 'Hillary loving hedgies' are now profiting from the 'Trump trade.' Epstein replies briefly that he has 'no intel but lots of profits.'

People (7)

Name Role Context
Jeffrey E. (Epstein) Recipient/Sender
Responding to a reporter about political intelligence and market profits regarding the Trump election.
Landon Thomas, Jr. Sender/Recipient
Financial Reporter for the New York Times seeking intelligence on Treasury appointments from Epstein.
Donald Trump Subject of discussion
Discussed regarding his election victory, 'Trump trade', and cabinet picks.
Reince Priebus Mentioned
Mentioned regarding his selection (Chief of Staff) impacting Treasury choices.
Steven Mnuchin Mentioned
Discussed as a potential Treasury Secretary nominee.
Ronald Reagan Comparison
Trump compared to 'Reagan 2.0'.
Hillary Clinton Mentioned
Referenced in relation to hedge fund managers ('Hillary loving hedgies').

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
New York Times
Employer of Landon Thomas, Jr.
US Treasury
Discussion regarding the appointment of the Treasury Secretary.
JEE
Entity mentioned in the confidentiality footer (likely Jeffrey E. Epstein).

Timeline (1 events)

November 2016
Post-2016 US Presidential Election market reaction ('The Trump trade').
USA
Hedge fund managers

Relationships (1)

Landon Thomas, Jr. Journalistic Source/Contact Jeffrey Epstein
Thomas asks Epstein for 'intel' on high-level government appointments and his opinion on a market thesis.

Key Quotes (5)

"no intel but lots of profits"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032370.jpg
Quote #1
"Any further intel on Treasury?"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032370.jpg
Quote #2
"all the Hillary loving hedgies I am talking to are congratulating themselves for making so much money last week. They are all Trump lovers now!"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032370.jpg
Quote #3
"Someone to underscore/push forward this notion that he is Reagan 2.0"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032370.jpg
Quote #4
"It is the property of JEE"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032370.jpg
Quote #5

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,603 characters)

From: Thomas Jr., Landon [REDACTED]
Sent: 11/14/2016 2:54:06 PM
To: jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]
Subject: Re: Trump
Importance: High
do you agree with my thesis?
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 9:53 AM, jeffrey E. wrote:
no intel but lots of profits
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 9:51 AM, Thomas Jr., Landon [REDACTED] wrote:
Any further intel on Treasury? Priebus choice suggests to me that he may go for a bigger name in treasury than Mnuchin. Someone to underscore/push forward this notion that he is Reagan 2.0 (as some are suggesting). I am just not sure who that person would be. The Trump trade certainly seems to have legs -- all the Hillary loving hedgies I am talking to are congratulating themselves for making so much money last week. They are all Trump lovers now!
--
Landon Thomas, Jr.
Financial Reporter
New York Times
[REDACTED]
http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/t/landon_jr_thomas/index.html
--
please note
The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
--
Landon Thomas, Jr.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032370

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document